Care - Judgment Search Results

Gupte Cardiac Care Center and Hospital Vs. Olympic Pharma Care Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC2339; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)540; III(2004)BC122; 2004(2)BLJR1095; 2004(3)CTC674; (2004)3MLJ153(SC); 2004(4)SCALE268; (2004)6SCC756

referred to as 'manufacturer' and 'dealer', for short).2. Olympic Pharma Care Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi has filed a suit against the

Care Hospital, the Heart Institute (Rep. by Its Managing Director, Dr. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

one of the important reasons for bringing the patient to CARE hospital was because of the low package cost of surgery

Ma Care and ors. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(88)LC80Tri(Mum.)bai

directions made by TTK and communicated by him to Ma Care is in the nature of recommendations or orders also is

Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. Vs. Coke

Court: US Supreme Court

individuals who (because of age or infirmity) are unable to care for themselves (as such terms are defined and delimited by

Ma Care and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC803

of the Asst. Commissioner, in which he has held MA Care to be the manufacturer. The explanation that it related to

Pacific Health Care Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in: (2001)123STC305Tribunal

the proposed franchise agreement. In the case of Jesie Household Care Products (RN-372 of 1999) the EC was granted on October

Bonny Baby Care Pvt Ltd and Others Vs. Cce, Noida and Another

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

trade mark by Smt. Sarla Aneja to M/s Bonny Baby Care (P) Ltd (BBC), the later became owner thereof in absence

Core Health Care Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

was already being carried on by the assessee.47. After a careful consideration of the entire relevant facts, material and evidence existing

Core Health Care Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2001)70TTJ(Ahd.)490

the order of the learned JM, on this point.I have carefully considered the rival submissions made by the learned representatives and

Core Health Care Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

order of the learned JM, on this point.150. I have carefully considered the rival submissions made by the learned representatives and