Capitalize - Judgment Search Results

Capital One Financial Corporation Vs. Capital One Private Ltd. and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)3CALLT450(HC)

..... b the other subsidiaries and associates are capital one service inc capital one auto finance capital one services canada inc capital one marketing securities limited capital one finance company the plaintiff and its ..... and the word one was used by them to indicate the best the expression capital one in india is invariably associated with their business renowned financial companies have established .....

Chloro Controls (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Severn Trent Water Purification ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(3)BomCR119; [2006]131CompCas501(Bom); [2006]71SCL396(Bom)

..... the company petition is maintainable alternatively it was argued that the original shareholder viz capital controls delaware company inc having ceased to exist by virtue of amalgamation amounts to ..... the learned company judge that in case of amalgamation the shareholding of erstwhile company capital controls delaware company inc stood automatically transferred and vested to a transferee company seven .....

M/S Radharamana Capital Services Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Jaypee Capital Servic ...

Court: Delhi

..... m p 673 2009 judgment dated 30 11 2012 m s radharamana capital services pvt ltd petitioner through mr j p sengh sr adv with ..... jain mr sumeet batra and ms ankita gupta advs versus m s jaypee capital services ltd respondent through mr anurag kr agarwal and mr umesh mishra ..... the nse arbn f sod 441 2008 7386 january 29 2009 jaypee capital services ltd trading member 1114 11th floor naurang house 21 k g .....

Delhi Urban House Owners Welfare Association, Vs. Union of India,

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 60(1995)DLT644; 1996(37)DRJ126; 1995RLR533

..... 2 21 a government means the government of the national capital territory of delhi 9 to understand the rival contentions we ..... behalf with the prior approval of the government of the national capital territory of delhi similarly the notification bringing into operation the ..... impugned act was both in form and substance taxation on capital and was hence beyond the competence of the state legislature .....

Unity Realty and Developers Ltd., Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Bw ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR333; 2009(111)BomLR3853

..... because of revision it was decided to allow respondent no 3clearwater capital partners cyprus limited ccpl or clearwater to invest rs 48 51 ..... a equity shares of the company clearwater holds 3 90 equity capital of khil agreed to participate as investor shareholders in the ..... cost increased respondent no 3 who was having 3 90 equity capital of respondent no 2khil agreed to participate as an investor .....

M.D., Orissa Co-operative Housing Corporation Ltd. Vs. K.S. Sudarshan

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... is determined by age of deceased and by calculation as to what capital sum would yield the multiplicand by way of annual interest section 168 ..... the claimants whichever is higher and by the calculation as to what capital sum if invested at a rate of interest appropriate to a ..... this regard should also be had to the fact that ultimately the capital sum should also be consumed up over the period for which .....

Akhil Bhartiya Sarkari Lottery Vyapari Mahasangh and anr. Vs. Comm. of ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999IVAD(Delhi)593; 1999CriLJ3600; 80(1999)DLT561; 1999(50)DRJ495

..... tickets both state and private have been prohibited in the entire national capital territory of delhi w e f april 17 1999 under section ..... or danger to human life and property in the entire national capital territory of delhi 9 this order stand remain in force for ..... breach of peace danger to human life and property in the national capital territory of delhi 16 as is also clear from the notification .....

Smt. Ram Rakhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2002Delhi458; 99(2002)DLT51; 2002(64)DRJ156

s b sinha c j 1 a question seemingly of some importance is involved in these two writ petitions as...

Mr. Jambu Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs.

Court: Mumbai

1 rule rule made returnable forthwith heard the learned counsel for the parties 2 respondent no 1 filed the complaint...

Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh Vs. Decent Dyeing Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1990(26)ECC193; 1990(45)ELT201(SC); JT1989(Suppl1)SC377; 1989(2)SCALE1262; (1990)1SCC180; [1989]Supp2SCR430

sabyasachi mukharji j 1 this is an appeal under section 35l b of the central excises salt act 1944 hereinafter...