Cantonment Board - Judgment Search Results
Cantonment Board,meerut . Vs. Afzal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-23-2019
3867/2019; 3868/2019; 3869/2019; 3870/2019; 3871/2019 JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.1. This batch of appeals, is filed by the Cantonment Board, Meerut and others, aggrieved by the common order 1 C.A.Nos.3814 of 19 etc. dated 19.12.2013 passed by the … No.3814 of 2019. The notice issued to the said respondent reads as under : “ Office of the Cantonment Board Meerut, dated 22nd Aug, 2006 To Afzal Ahmad S/o Faqruddin, 55/pt Ghosi Mohalla, B.I. Bazar, Meerut Cantt. Subject
Secunderabad Cantonment Board Vs. M/s B. Ramachandraiah And Sons
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-15-2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 900-902 OF2021(@ SLP (CIVIL) Nos.27960-62 of 2019) SECUNDERABAD CANTONMENT BOARD …APPELLANT VERSUS M/S B. RAMACHANDRAIAH & SONS …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1.Leave granted. 2.These appeals arise out of … Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Arbitration Act”].. On 02.09.2000, the appellant before us, Secunderabad Cantonment Board [“Appellant”]., floated a notice inviting tender [“N.I.T.”]. for an annual term contract for:1. Repairs to Main Roads (Resurfacing
Cantonment Board, Meerut and anr. Vs. K.P. Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-01-2010
Reported in: JT2010(2)SC130; 2010(2)SCALE68; (2010)2SCC518
entitled to the refund of the amount deposited by them over and above the bid given by them. Cantonment Board, the appellant herein has been directed to dispose of the application made by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 … favouring the refund of amount, few facts would be necessary.3. Under Section 60 of the Cantonment Act, the Cantonment Board was empowered to impose toll tax. Accordingly, on 08.01.2005, a Gazette Notification was issued for the imposition of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Andhra Circle, Secunderabad Rep. by Exe ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)ALT27(SC); JT2003(9)SC316; 2003(10)SCALE33; (2003)12SCC315; (2004)1UPLBEC882
said decision. The controversy revolves around the refusal to sanction the plan submitted by different parties to the Cantonment Board for construction of building over the land in question. The central government raised its claim over the land … which the respondents proposed to raise construction and had submitted plans therefore, talk in the limits of Secunderabad Cantonment Board. There is a bungalow No. 215 in Thokaila Village, which is said to have been purchased in the
Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-11-2008
Reported in: JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223
central question which arises for adjudication in this appeal is regarding the power, competence and authority of the Cantonment Board to levy entry tax on vehicles entering into the cantonment area.3. Appellant No. 1, Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a … the Cantonment Board to levy entry tax on vehicles entering into the cantonment area.3. Appellant No. 1, Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in exercise of the
Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Church of North India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-13-2011
the lessee shall vacate the premises before the expiry of the lease as and when required by the Cantonment Board provided seven days' notice to this effect is given in writing.3. The case of the appellants is that … The appellants needed the premises. After the expiry of the lease on 31.3.1984, the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board stopped accepting the rent.4. The appellants served a notice of seven days as required under Section 4 of
Cantonment Board, Jammu and ors. Vs. Jagat Pal Singh Cheema
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-09-2012
filed by the respondent challenging the punishment of removal from service that was imposed on him by the Cantonment Board, Jammu. It may be noticed, at the outset, that the High Court had allowed the Writ Petition of … respondent on the ground that the order of the Officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, affirming the order of the Cantonment Board removing the respondent from service was passed on the basis of an invalid reference made to the Officer
Cantonment Board, Dinapore and Others Vs. Taramani Devi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-1991
Reported in: AIR1995SC61; 1992Supp(2)SCC501
Boards on terms and conditions embodied in the respective sanctions. Section 181 of the said Act authorises the Cantonment Board to grant such sanction by resolution. The resolution is suspendible under Section 52(1)(b) of the Act by the … such view that these appeals are before us by the Union of India in one case and the Cantonment Board and others in the other.5. Apart from the fact that these appeals have been pending before this Court
Cantonment Board, Secunderabad Vs. G. Venketram Reddy and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-22-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1210; 1995(2)SCALE507; (1995)4SCC561; 1995Supp(2)SCC576
'the Act').2. It is the answer to this question that would determine the jurisdiction and power of the Cantonment Board of Secunderabad (in brief 'the Board') to levy and collect octroi on substitute of ghee and all kinds … the previous sanction of the Central Government. There was no dispute that the octroi was levied by the Cantonment Board after obtaining sanction of the Central Government. But what has been found is that the ambit of the
Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Mohanlal and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-02-1996
Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)436; AIR1996SC1586; JT1996(1)SC77; 1996(1)SCALE153; (1996)2SCC23; [1996]1SCR1
is seen that the respondent in his reply had admitted that they constructed, as pointed out by the Cantonment Board in its notice dated September 13, 1974, and the previous notice. But he stated that he had done … the notice was issued and the reply thereof was given by the respondent.3. It is seen that the Cantonment Board is an elected body represented by people themselves. When opportunity was given putting on notice of illegal construction
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free