Cane - Judgment Search Results

Champaran Cane Concern Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1737; [1963]49ITR152(SC); [1964]2SCR921

S.K. Das, J. 1. The Champaran Cane Concern, appellant before us, was assessed toagricultural income-tax under the

Harinagar Cane Farm and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC903; [1964(9)FLR47]; (1963)ILLJ692SC; [1964]2SCR458

weigh bridge at Paharchak, operating lake-pumps, loading and unloading of canes and letting buildings on hire. 3. M/s. Harinagar Cane Farm

Ramnagar Cane and Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. JatIn Chakravorty and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1960SC1012; [1960(1)FLR411]; (1961)ILLJ244SC; [1960]3SCR968

14 of 1947, (hereinafter called the Act). The appellant, Ramnagar Cane & Sugar Co. Ltd., Calcutta, is a company incorporated under

Indian Cane Power Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

ANENXURE-D RESPECTIVELY AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.10349/2021 BETWEEN INDIAN CANE POWER LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE, No.677, SHRI KALLESHWARA RICE

Victor Cane Industries Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Dibrugarh, Assam. The firm is engaged in the manufacture of cane baskets and furniture and is a registered dealer under the

Sugar Cane Research Centre Through Its Officer Incharge and Genda Sing ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2006(110)FLR1143]

Bharati Sapru, J.1. This writ petition has been filed against an award of the Labour Court dated 15.2.2000 passed in...

Dhan Prakash Cane Crusher Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2002]128STC654(All)

R.B. Misra, J.1. The present trade tax revision has been preferred under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act,...

The Sugar-cane Growers' Association Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1988Kant132

ORDER1. This matter is disposed of at the stage of preliminary hearing after notice to respondents and after hearing the...

Co-operative Cane Development Union Ltd. Vs. Nahar Singh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR670]; (1999)IIILLJ305All

paid gratuity as their services were governed by the U.P. Cane Co-operative Service Regulations, 1975 (for short the Regulations) are the

Kohinoor Cane Crusher Vs. Additional Secretary, Govt. of India

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1992(39)ECC144; 1991LC201(Allahabad); 1991(52)ELT360(All)

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. The validity of order passed by Central Government, under Section 36(2) of the Central Excise Act,...