Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Candied - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 2015

The Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust and Others Vs. Dipesh Mehta and O ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-29-2015

1. Plaintiff Nos.2 to 5 claim to be trustees of Plaintiff No.1 trust and seek injunctive reliefs in the suit against the Defendants, who are claimed to be trespassers, usurpers and intermeddlers in the property of...


Feb 10 2021

Shamsheer Kurudan Candy vs Raslin

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-10-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942 Tr.P(C).No.172 OF 2020 TO TRANSFER OP 226/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY TO THE FAMILY...


Jul 17 2001

Breach Candy Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai Vs. Babulal B. Parde ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-17-2001

Reported in: [2001(91)FLR1185]; 2002(2)MhLj227

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The workman in the present case, who is the First Respondent in Writ Petition No. 2021 of 1997 filed by the employer and the petitioner in companion Writ Petition No. 111 of 2000...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 24 2009

Breach Candy Hospital Trust Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and o ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-24-2009

Reported in: (2010)228CTR(Bom)381

D.G. Karnik, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dt. 31st March, 2009 passed by the Chief CIT, Mumbai (respondent No. 1) rejecting the petitioner's request for grant of approval under Section 10(23C)(via)...


Sep 25 1995

Candy Filter (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Labou ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-25-1995

Reported in: (1996)ILLJ1113Bom

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. Heard learned counsel on all sides. Heard forthwith for final hearing. 2. Prior to the 13th March 1992, a sum of Rs. 14,61,991.65 was due and payable by petitioner No. 1 company to...


Feb 09 1998

Breach Candy Hospital and Research Centre Vs. Babulal B. Pardeshi

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-09-1998

Reported in: [1998(79)FLR533]; (1998)IILLJ515Bom

Nishita Mhatre, JJ] Admission to professional colleges - Technical courses - Publication of brochure on basis of which candidates seek admission to various institution keeping in mind their merit and preference of colleges Held, For ensuring adherence


Apr 19 2000

Breach Candy Hospital and Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-19-2000

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC123

1. These appeals are before us on reference by a Division Bench. The issue referred is as under.2. The dispute related to concessional assessment of Air-Conditioners received by the appellants. Notification No. 56/78, dated 1-3-1978 (as...


Nov 02 2006

Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-02-2006

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC42

1. Heard both sides. The issue involved is whether the appellants are liable to pay service tax as "Mandap Keepers" under Section 65(67) of the Finance Act 1994 for providing services of salt water swimming bath...


Oct 20 1997

Crazy Candies and Sweets P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-20-1997

Reported in: (1998)(101)ELT361TriDel

1. Arguing on the application for waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 95,653.50, learned Counsel, Shri Gopal Prasad submits that credit of this amount has been denied on two counts, (i) a sum of Rs. 74,623.50 has...


Jan 14 1998

Crazy Candies and Sweets (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-14-1998

Reported in: (1998)(102)ELT161TriDel

1. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of confectionery items, was using sugar, plastic printed wrappers and plastic jars as inputs and claiming Modvat benefit in respect of the duty paid on the inputs.Declaration had been filed...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial