Candidly - Judgment Search Results
M/S. Candid Builders Pvt. Ltd., vs Sri. a. C. Srinivas
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-06-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2015 OF 2021 (AA) BETWEEN: M/S. CANDID BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,...
Candid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-17-2006
Reported in: (2007)5VST381(Ker)
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 against the order passed by...
Cc Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)(70)LC514Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-13-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALT48(SC); 2001(76)ECC10; 2001(130)ELT404(SC); (2002)9SCC764
S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. Under appeal is an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal declining to condone the delay on the part of the Revenue in filing...
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT363Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...
Miss Neelima Shangla, Ph. D. Candidate Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-1986
Reported in: AIR1987SC169; 1987(35)BLJR506; [1987(54)FLR652]; 1987LabIC34; 1986(2)SCALE435; (1986)4SCC268; [1986]3SCR785; 1987(1)SLJ195(SC); 1986(2)LC739(SC)
O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. Miss Neelima Shangla desires to be appointed to the Haryana Civil Service (Judicial) Branch. She has a brilliant academic record. The certificates produced by her show that from Matriculation to LL.B. she...
Mrs. Indravati Rajan Yadav Indian Inhabitant Vs. Shantidevi Kamleshkum ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-13-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR288; 2006(1)BomCR206; 2006(1)MhLj282
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Appearance has been put up on behalf of Respondent No. 3. None present for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Even otherwise considering the order to be passed, notice on them dispensed with. Rule, made...
Tarun Sharma Son of Shri Deepak Sharma Vs. Vishwas Sarang Son of Shri ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-21-2010
ORDERR.C. Mishra, J.1. As a common question of law has arisen in both the trials, this order shall govern disposal of interim applications (registered as I.A. No.48/2009 in Election Petition No. 27/2009 and I.A. No. 14/2009...
Shantha Gururao Narasapur Vs. the Chairman, Selection Committee for Ad ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-25-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Kant81
ORDER1. This petition coming up for further orders, by consent of parties, is taken up for final disposal at the stage of preliminarily hearing after notice to respondents.2. The petitioner is a Doctor serving in the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free