Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Candidly - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 06 2025

M/S. Candid Builders Pvt. Ltd., vs Sri. a. C. Srinivas

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-06-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2015 OF 2021 (AA) BETWEEN: M/S. CANDID BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,...


Oct 17 2006

Candid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-17-2006

Reported in: (2007)5VST381(Ker)

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 against the order passed by...


Apr 16 1997

Cc Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-16-1997

Reported in: (1997)(70)LC514Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 13 2001

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-13-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)ALT48(SC); 2001(76)ECC10; 2001(130)ELT404(SC); (2002)9SCC764

S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. Under appeal is an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal declining to condone the delay on the part of the Revenue in filing...


Apr 16 1997

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-16-1997

Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT363Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...


Sep 17 1986

Miss Neelima Shangla, Ph. D. Candidate Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-17-1986

Reported in: AIR1987SC169; 1987(35)BLJR506; [1987(54)FLR652]; 1987LabIC34; 1986(2)SCALE435; (1986)4SCC268; [1986]3SCR785; 1987(1)SLJ195(SC); 1986(2)LC739(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. Miss Neelima Shangla desires to be appointed to the Haryana Civil Service (Judicial) Branch. She has a brilliant academic record. The certificates produced by her show that from Matriculation to LL.B. she...


Sep 13 2005

Mrs. Indravati Rajan Yadav Indian Inhabitant Vs. Shantidevi Kamleshkum ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-13-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR288; 2006(1)BomCR206; 2006(1)MhLj282

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Appearance has been put up on behalf of Respondent No. 3. None present for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Even otherwise considering the order to be passed, notice on them dispensed with. Rule, made...


Jun 21 2010

Tarun Sharma Son of Shri Deepak Sharma Vs. Vishwas Sarang Son of Shri ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-21-2010

ORDERR.C. Mishra, J.1. As a common question of law has arisen in both the trials, this order shall govern disposal of interim applications (registered as I.A. No.48/2009 in Election Petition No. 27/2009 and I.A. No. 14/2009...


Jun 25 1982

Shantha Gururao Narasapur Vs. the Chairman, Selection Committee for Ad ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-25-1982

Reported in: AIR1983Kant81

ORDER1. This petition coming up for further orders, by consent of parties, is taken up for final disposal at the stage of preliminarily hearing after notice to respondents.2. The petitioner is a Doctor serving in the...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial