Candidating - Judgment Search Results

Candid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2007)5VST381(Ker)

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 against the order passed by...

Cc Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)(70)LC514Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(1)ALT48(SC); 2001(76)ECC10; 2001(130)ELT404(SC); (2002)9SCC764

S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. Under appeal is an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal declining to condone the delay on the part of the Revenue in filing...

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT363Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the appeal which has been preferred by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai against the captioned order of...

Miss Neelima Shangla, Ph. D. Candidate Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC169; 1987(35)BLJR506; [1987(54)FLR652]; 1987LabIC34; 1986(2)SCALE435; (1986)4SCC268; [1986]3SCR785; 1987(1)SLJ195(SC); 1986(2)LC739(SC)

mentioned here that there were altogether 774 applicants, while 390 only appeared at the test. Out of the candidates who appeared at the test, 54 candidates belonging to the general category, four candidates belonging to backward classes,

Mrs. Indravati Rajan Yadav Indian Inhabitant Vs. Shantidevi Kamleshkum ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR288; 2006(1)BomCR206; 2006(1)MhLj282

to Respondent No. 3 Corporation, Respondent No. 1 was declared elected. The seat was reserved for female (OBC) candidate. An election petition was filed by a voter before the Additional Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes at

Tarun Sharma Son of Shri Deepak Sharma Vs. Vishwas Sarang Son of Shri ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

of non-disclosure of cause of action or a triable issue.2. Incidentally, none of the petitioners is an unsuccessful candidate but each one of them was entitled to vote at the elections in question. The respondent in E.P.

Shantha Gururao Narasapur Vs. the Chairman, Selection Committee for Ad ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1983Kant81

received an intimation by which she was directed to apply for Post Graduate Diploma Course as an in-service candidate. She sent her application in accordance with the instructions received as per the Official Memorandum dated 22nd August,