Candidate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: candidate Page 1 of about 8 results (0.020 seconds)Cc Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1997)(70)LC514Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCandid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.
Court: Kerala
Reported in: (2007)5VST381(Ker)
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT363Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1 year 5 months and 5 days in filing the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Candid Enterprises
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2002(1)ALT48(SC); 2001(76)ECC10; 2001(130)ELT404(SC); (2002)9SCC764
S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. Under appeal is an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Neelima Shangla, Ph. D. Candidate Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1987SC169; 1987(35)BLJR506; [1987(54)FLR652]; 1987LabIC34; 1986(2)SCALE435; (1986)4SCC268; [1986]3SCR785; 1987(1)SLJ195(SC); 1986(2)LC739(SC)
to the High Court. The net result is that qualified candidates, though available, were not selected and were not appointed. Miss
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShantha Gururao Narasapur Vs. the Chairman, Selection Committee for Ad ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: AIR1983Kant81
Post Graduate Course in order of priority. In case, the candidates could not be selected for the course for which they
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Indravati Rajan Yadav Indian Inhabitant Vs. Shantidevi Kamleshkum ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR288; 2006(1)BomCR206; 2006(1)MhLj282
Section 32, a greater number of votes than the said candidate. In the instant case, there is no dispute that Respondent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarun Sharma Son of Shri Deepak Sharma Vs. Vishwas Sarang Son of Shri ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
-(a) that on the date of his election a returned candidate was not qualified, or was disqualified, to be chosen to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>