Canal - Judgment Search Results
Rajasthan Canal Project, Vijayanagar Circle, Through State of Rajastha ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-24-1975
Reported in: (1976)IILLJ25Raj; 1975()WLN679
were terminated on account of retrenchment in respect of the post of Mechanic Grade I in the Rajasthan Canal Project. However, the Industrial [Tribunal also came to the conclusion that the provisions of 25F of the Industrial
Consolidated Canal Co. Vs. Mesa Canal Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-09-1900
Consolidated Canal Co. v. Mesa Canal Co. - 177 U.S. 296 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Consolidated Canal Co. v. Mesa
Montezuma Canal Co. Vs. Smithville Canal Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-28-1910
Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville Canal Co. - 218 U.S. 371 (1910) U.S. Supreme Court Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville
18-section briefs on any result in this list
***** Vs. Superintending Canal Officer and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.20332 of 2013 Date of Decision:13. 09.2013 ***** Harlal and another . .Petitioners Versus Superintending Canal Officer and others . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for
Executive Engineer, Canal Lining, Division No. 2 Vs. Shri Vijay Kumar, ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-25-2005
Reported in: 2006(3)ARBLR279(P& H); (2006)143PLR96
Matched in: Parties Executive Engineer, Canal Lining, Division No. 2 Vs. Shri Vijay Kumar, Govt. Contractor and ors.
M/S. Canal Investments and Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-13-2011
ITA No. 261 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S. CANAL INVESTMENTS and; INDUSTRIES LTD. Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA III Respondent For Appellant : Mr. A.K.Dey,
Subhash Chander, Canal Patwari, Ziladari Section and ors. Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-12-1994
Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ498P& H; (1994)107PLR576
Bali, J.1. The undisputed facts of the case reveal that petitioner, Subhash Chander and others were employed as Canal Patwari on work charge basis on February 15, 1988. Their initial appointment was upto March 31, 1988, and
Exe. Engr., Canal Lining Areas Dvn. Vs. Surjit Raj, Store Chowkidar an ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-14-1994
Reported in: (1995)ILLJ41P& H; (1994)107PLR20
V.K. Bali, J. 1. The Executive Engineer, Canal Lining Area Division, Tarn Taran, through present petition filed by him under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of
Superintending Engineer, Canal Project Vs. Phoola and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1984
Reported in: 2(1985)ACC85
Phoolrani as costs of this appeal. A copy of this order should be sent to the Chairman, Rajasthan Canal Board so that he ensures that in matters of compensation to the Workmen such frivolous appeals should not
Godavari Pravara Canal Co-operative Purchase and Sale Union Ltd. Vs. K ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-14-1973
Reported in: AIR1974Bom52; 1974MhLJ75
1. The original defendant Godavari Pravara Canal purchase and Sale Union, a Co-operative Society has filed this appeal against the order of remand made by
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free