Canal - Judgment Search Results

Rajasthan Canal Project, Vijayanagar Circle, Through State of Rajastha ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1976)IILLJ25Raj; 1975()WLN679

were terminated on account of retrenchment in respect of the post of Mechanic Grade I in the Rajasthan Canal Project. However, the Industrial [Tribunal also came to the conclusion that the provisions of 25F of the Industrial

Consolidated Canal Co. Vs. Mesa Canal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Consolidated Canal Co. v. Mesa Canal Co. - 177 U.S. 296 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Consolidated Canal Co. v. Mesa

Montezuma Canal Co. Vs. Smithville Canal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville Canal Co. - 218 U.S. 371 (1910) U.S. Supreme Court Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville

***** Vs. Superintending Canal Officer and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.20332 of 2013 Date of Decision:13. 09.2013 ***** Harlal and another . .Petitioners Versus Superintending Canal Officer and others . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for

Kayamkulam Canal Protection Council vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

P.CHALY THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942 WP(C).No.386 OF 2021(S) PETITIONER/S: 1 KAYAMKULAM CANAL PROTECTION COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEEPTHI KUMAR, AGED 60 YEARS, SON OF VELAPPAN PILLAI, KAYAMKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA

Canal Samrakshana Samithi vs the Chief Engineer

Court: Kerala

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 25TH POUSHA, 1942 PETITIONER: CANAL SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MOOSA KOYA, S/O.KALANTHAN, AGED 42 YEARS, KODALIPURATH MEETHAL, ULLIYERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN

Trb Canal Upabhokthru Karshaka Samity vs the District Collector, Idukk ...

Court: Kerala

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, WP(C) NO. 26768 OF 2013 PETITIONER/S: TRB CANAL UPABHOKTHRU KARSHAKA SAMITY REG.NO.1352/2005, ANACKALPETTY, MICHELGIRI P.O. MARAYUR, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 620 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, JOHNY MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW,

Executive Engineer, Canal Lining, Division No. 2 Vs. Shri Vijay Kumar, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2006(3)ARBLR279(P& H); (2006)143PLR96

Matched in: Parties Executive Engineer, Canal Lining, Division No. 2 Vs. Shri Vijay Kumar, Govt. Contractor and ors.

M/S. Canal Investments and Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court: Kolkata

ITA No. 261 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S. CANAL INVESTMENTS and; INDUSTRIES LTD. Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA III Respondent For Appellant : Mr. A.K.Dey,

Subhash Chander, Canal Patwari, Ziladari Section and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ498P& H; (1994)107PLR576

Bali, J.1. The undisputed facts of the case reveal that petitioner, Subhash Chander and others were employed as Canal Patwari on work charge basis on February 15, 1988. Their initial appointment was upto March 31, 1988, and