Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Camera - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search
Aug 30 1983

Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-30-1983

Reported in: (1983)36CTR(Bom)385; [1984]150ITR227(Bom); [1983]15TAXMAN223(Bom)

instance of the assessee.3. The assessee deals in and manufactures cameras. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1963-64,


Feb 27 1981

Central Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-27-1981

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT344(Bom)

Rage, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of Deshmukh J. (as he then was) dismissing the...


May 06 1968

Camera House, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: May-06-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Bom437; [1970]25STC354(Bom)

the advance that has been made in the manufacture of cameras, and even in the matter of the subsequent process of


Jan 19 1970

Central Camera Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-1970

Reported in: [1971]27STC112(Mad)

Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The assessee, Messrs Central Camera Company (Private) Limited, dealers in photographic materials at No. 35/4


Aug 25 2005

Cce Vs. Camera World

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Aug-25-2005

Reported in: (2006)4STR462

2. Heard Shri J.R. Madhium, Ld. JDR for the Appellants-Revenue and None for the Respondent.3. Shri Madhium submits that the...


Apr 23 1998

Mazda Camera Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-1998

Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT773Tri(Mum.)bai

letter credit on 16-7-1992 for import of parts of photographic camera. Prior to 30-6-1992 import of such parts was under Open


Feb 26 1951

Universal Camera Corp. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-26-1951

Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board - 340 U.S. 474 (1951) U.S.


Oct 25 1983

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-25-1983

Reported in: (1984)43CTR(Bom)2; [1984]150ITR231(Bom); [1985]23TAXMAN457(Bom)

Desai, J.1. This review application has been placed for admission. It deserves to be rejected on a two-fold basis. In...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial