Camera - Judgment Search Results
Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-30-1983
Reported in: (1983)36CTR(Bom)385; [1984]150ITR227(Bom); [1983]15TAXMAN223(Bom)
instance of the assessee.3. The assessee deals in and manufactures cameras. During the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1963-64,
Central Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-1981
Reported in: 1981(8)ELT344(Bom)
Rage, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of Deshmukh J. (as he then was) dismissing the...
Camera House, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-06-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Bom437; [1970]25STC354(Bom)
the advance that has been made in the manufacture of cameras, and even in the matter of the subsequent process of
Central Camera Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-1970
Reported in: [1971]27STC112(Mad)
Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The assessee, Messrs Central Camera Company (Private) Limited, dealers in photographic materials at No. 35/4
Cce Vs. Camera World
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Aug-25-2005
Reported in: (2006)4STR462
2. Heard Shri J.R. Madhium, Ld. JDR for the Appellants-Revenue and None for the Respondent.3. Shri Madhium submits that the...
Mazda Camera Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-23-1998
Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT773Tri(Mum.)bai
letter credit on 16-7-1992 for import of parts of photographic camera. Prior to 30-6-1992 import of such parts was under Open
Universal Camera Corp. Vs. Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-26-1951
Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board - 340 U.S. 474 (1951) U.S.
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-25-1983
Reported in: (1984)43CTR(Bom)2; [1984]150ITR231(Bom); [1985]23TAXMAN457(Bom)
Desai, J.1. This review application has been placed for admission. It deserves to be rejected on a two-fold basis. In...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›