Camera - Judgment Search Results

Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1983)36CTR(Bom)385; [1984]150ITR227(Bom); [1983]15TAXMAN223(Bom)

same accounting year. The dies had been purchased for manufacturing cameras with American collaboration, but these cameras, when so produced, were

Universal Camera Corp. Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board - 340 U.S. 474 (1951) U.S.

Camera House, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1969Bom437; [1970]25STC354(Bom)

the advance that has been made in the manufacture of cameras, and even in the matter of the subsequent process of

Mazda Camera Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT773Tri(Mum.)bai

letter credit on 16-7-1992 for import of parts of photographic camera. Prior to 30-6-1992 import of such parts was under Open

Central Camera Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. the Government of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1971]27STC112(Mad)

Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. The assessee, Messrs Central Camera Company (Private) Limited, dealers in photographic materials at No. 35/4

Central Camera Company Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT344(Bom)

Rage, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of Deshmukh J. (as he then was) dismissing the...

Cce Vs. Camera World

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2006)4STR462

2. Heard Shri J.R. Madhium, Ld. JDR for the Appellants-Revenue and None for the Respondent.3. Shri Madhium submits that the...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Ace Camera Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)43CTR(Bom)2; [1984]150ITR231(Bom); [1985]23TAXMAN457(Bom)

Desai, J.1. This review application has been placed for admission. It deserves to be rejected on a two-fold basis. In...