Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cam - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2005

Cam Transports Vs. Saidalavi

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-11-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)KLT679

Matched in: Parties Cam Transports Vs. Saidalavi


Jan 25 2002

Metal Cam Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)(80)ECC350

Matched in: Parties Metal Cam Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise


Oct 26 2006

Cam Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-26-2006

Matched in: Parties Cam Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2008

Cable News Network Lp, Lllp (Cnn) Vs. Cam News Network Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-07-2008

Reported in: LC2008(1)113; 2008(36)PTC255(Del)

identity which is unique and distinct and with which the readers can immediately associate with.4. Fourthly, the plaintiff came to know about the defendant's magazine in the year 2003. However, no action was taken at that time


Jan 21 2008

Shri Devinder Khanna Vs. Mehta Cad Cam Systems Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-2008

Reported in: II(2008)BC571; 148(2008)DLT152

Matched in: Parties Shri Devinder Khanna Vs. Mehta Cad Cam Systems Pvt. Ltd.


Aug 10 2006

E. Shanmugam Vs. Aps Cam-o-matec P. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-10-2006

Reported in: [2009]148CompCas701(Delhi)

under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act').2. The appellant herein was a director of APS Cam-O-Matec P. Ltd. ('the respondent-company') and was/is holding 40 shares. The balance 200 shares were equally held by Mr.


Nov 22 2012

M/S. Crest Cam Cnc Systems Vs. Cce, Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-22-2012

Matched in: Parties M/S. Crest Cam Cnc Systems Vs. Cce, Bangalore


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial