Call In - Judgment Search Results

Call Vs. Palmer

Court: US Supreme Court

for the note was as follows: Palmer delivered up to Call the $10,000 note, which he had purchased from Mrs. Davidson,

Long Sault Development Co. Vs. Call

Court: US Supreme Court

Long Sault Development Co. v. Call - 242 U.S. 272 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court Long Sault

Gauhati Public Call Office Association Vs. District Manager, Telephone ...

Court: Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

and that too while granting permission for establishment of Public Call Offices preferences have to be given to the special categories

Best Call Taxi Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)7STR218

1. During the period April, 2002 - September, 2003 the appellants had rendered "Call Taxi" services but did not pay...

“case Called Several Times Since Morning. Vs. Jagroop Kaur --respond ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

itself, the trial Court had passed the following order:- Case called several times since morning. Neither petitioner Harpinder Singh nor any

Best Call Taxi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2006)STR28

1. The lower authorities have imposed penalties of Rs. 22,615/-and Rs. 1,000/- under Sections 76 and 77 respectively of the...

Shriram Investment Services Limited, Unit of Shriram Group of Companie ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]133CompCas830(Mad); (2006)4MLJ743

Tribunal and Palki/Jeypad Investment (P) Ltd/Jeypad Investment (P) Ltd (hereinafter called 'Palki/Jeypad') is the claimant before the said Tribunal. This petition

Sunil Mittal & Anr vs.darzi on Call

Court: Delhi

1981; (bb) that the defendant adopted the trademark DARZI ON CALL logo since 2015 in respect of its tailoring and stitching

Western Union Tel. Co. Vs. Call Publishing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

stated, a considerable difference in the absolute rate charged the Call Company and the Journal Company was shown, but there was

M. Maruthavanaswami Alias Sadasiva Desika Pandarasannadhi Avergal Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad240; 85Ind.Cas.414; (1924)47MLJ770

1. These revision petitions have been filed in respect of two orders of the Subordinate Judge of Mayavaram, dated 29th...