Call - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: call Page 1 of about 35 results (0.023 seconds)Call Vs. Palmer
Court: US Supreme Court
in New Jersey, bought of Burnham the $10,000 note of Call, with five coupon notes of $500 each, not then due,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLong Sault Development Co. Vs. Call
Court: US Supreme Court
272 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court Long Sault Development Co. v. Call, 242 U.S. 272 (1916) Long Sault Development Company v. Call
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGauhati Public Call Office Association Vs. District Manager, Telephone ...
Court: Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati
took a policy decision to allow setting up of Public Call Offices and preferences have to be given to handicapped persons,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBest Call Taxi Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2007)7STR218
1. During the period April, 2002 - September, 2003 the appellants had rendered "Call Taxi" services but did not pay...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“case Called Several Times Since Morning. Vs. Jagroop Kaur --respond ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
itself, the trial Court had passed the following order:- Case called several times since morning. Neither petitioner Harpinder Singh nor any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBest Call Taxi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2006)STR28
1. The lower authorities have imposed penalties of Rs. 22,615/-and Rs. 1,000/- under Sections 76 and 77 respectively of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShriram Investment Services Limited, Unit of Shriram Group of Companie ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2006]133CompCas830(Mad); (2006)4MLJ743
Administrative or executive bodies, on the other hand, are often called upon to reach decisions in several matters in a purely
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Mittal & Anr vs.darzi on Call
Court: Delhi
business carried on under the said name as Darzis on Call. It could then have been said that the plaintiff No.1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWestern Union Tel. Co. Vs. Call Publishing Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
no evidence tending to show that the charge to the Call Company was, in itself, unreasonably high, that the charge to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Maruthavanaswami Alias Sadasiva Desika Pandarasannadhi Avergal Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1925Mad240; 85Ind.Cas.414; (1924)47MLJ770
1. These revision petitions have been filed in respect of two orders of the Subordinate Judge of Mayavaram, dated 29th...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>