Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 5 carriage of goods Page 1 of about 873 results (1.660 seconds)

S.P. Indu Vs. the General Manager, Metro Railway and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR905]; JT2007(12)SC302; 2008(2)SLJ6(SC)

..... not deny or dispute that, at all material times, the appellant had retained the lien of the south eastern railway administration. from the records, it appears that he was permanently absorbed in the metro railway project as governed by an act known as the calcutta metro railway (operation and maintenance) temporary provisions act, 1985 ; section 18 whereof reads as under:save as otherwise expressly provided in this ..... act, the provisions of the indian railways act, 1890, and the rules, orders or notifications made or issued thereunder shall, so .....

Ram Kishan Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All181

..... institution or body of its own creation, authority to make by-laws or resolutions as to subjects specified in the enactment, & with the object of carrying the enactment into operation & effect.it is obvious that such an authority is ancillary to legislation, & without it an attempt to provide for varying details & machinery to carry them out might become ..... those aspects of the question which do not appear to have been placed before that ct. in the case of jatindra, nath gupta . in accordance with view expressed by the calcutta h. ct. the madras h. c. & the d. b. of this ct., in the cases referred to in an earlier part of this judgment, regarding the ..... would thus appear that the principles enunciated by the majority of the f. c. in the case of jatindra nath gupta, have been followed by division benches of calcutta, madras & allahabad high courts in determining the question whether or not similar provisions in security acts of those provinces relating to an extension of the life of an act .....

Dr. Jnanendra Narayan Mukherjee and Others Vs. University of Calcutta ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1992Cal169,96CWN890

..... 50 of the calcutta university act, 1966 has not in fact been fulfilled. it is submitted ..... under previous university act and continued by the calcutta university act, 1966 and such attempt is unconstitutional, ultra vires and void. it is canvassed with much emphasis that the calcutta university council has no power to amend the calcutta u niversity first statutes and in any event after the calcutta university (temporary supersession) act, 1978 came into operation on the conditions laid down in section .....

The Management of Gordon Woodroffe Limited Vs. Government of Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ64Mad

..... were export oriented companies. it is further stated that all the customers had withdrawn the materials and cancelled the pending orders and thereby paralysed the operation and eroded the customer base which was built by continuous efforts by the management. under these circumstances, the management had no other alternative but to ..... the industrial disputes act, 1947, or any other labour laws. even during the conciliation proceedings, the petitioner was reiterating its demands and did not co-operate with the conciliation efforts made by the officers concerned. many conditions put forward by the management were unreasonable, harsh and stringent and, therefore, the staff ..... chemicals from customers for the purpose of job work, i.e., processing wet blue into finished leather, crust into finished leather involving chemical and mechanical operations. this processing is done only on customers' materials to their order and requirement and not on petitioner-company's own purchases to process the same .....

Sashibhusan Pati Vs. Mangala Biswal

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1953Ori171

..... commencement of the impugned act have been made practically non-executable and to that limited extent retrospective operation has been given to the impugned act. in support of this argument reliance was placed on a division bench decision of the calcutta high court reported in -- 'subodh g6pal v, behari lal', air 1951 cal 85 (k ..... high court distinguished the earlier decision and held that the provisions of the west bengal rent control (amendment) act of 1950 which were in terms retrospective in operation and applicable to pending cases were not unreasonable. therefore there is no general rule of law that the provisions of any act which have limited retrospective effect ..... and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities and in particular, the state shall endeavour to promote cottage industries on an individual or co-operative basis in rural areas.' the bhag-chasis are undoubtedly agricultural works and on account of the high rate of produce rent which they were required to .....

Surendra Kumar Nathany Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1990Cal236

..... or acquisition of the property after making over possession to the petitioner without the leave of the court. the respondent state attempted to get the stay of the operation of the order from the learned judge but failed. as the order had not been complied with the petitioner moved as application for contempt to ajit kumar sengupta ..... of. in the said application the respondent annexed a copy of the purported order of acquisition dated 10th march, 1988 purported to have been published in the calcutta gazette extra ordinary dated 10th march, 1988 by which the respondents are purporting to acquire the above property under the provisions of the west bengal land (requisition ..... months from the date of this order initiate a land acquisition proceeding for acquiring the premises no. 135/e, f, g and h shyama prasad mukherjee road, calcutta under the land acquisition act and complete the acquisition proceeding as expeditiously as possible. the amount of rs. 15,00,000/- which has already been paid to .....

Sri Krishna Salt Works Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP66; 2003(5)ALD484

..... 504 acres. before the commissioner, the hindustan mineral products company as well as collector contended that when boundaries between cheepurupally and devada villages were demarcated during the survey operations that have taken place in 1912, the extent of land covered by patta no. 98 in cheepurupally village would not be more than 350 acres. the settlement officer ..... by the trial court under section 14(1) of the act....'44. the effect of order of remand was considered by the supreme court in united bank of india, calcutta v. abhijit tea company private limited and ors., 2000 (6) supreme 183, and held as under:'...but, it is now well settled that an order of remand ..... substitution of the finding of the high court for that of the appellate tribunal. the learned advocate general also referred to the decision of the privy council in toronto railway co. v. corporation of the city of toronto, 1904 ac 809 (g).the relevant observations were at page 815. nor did the order of the appellate tribunal .....

Kiran Anandrao Pawar and Others Vs. Chief General Manager, M/s. IRB Ko ...

Court : Mumbai

..... this section, the expression capital outlay shall include the anticipated cost of certain essential on goings or imminent works like improvements, strengthening, widening, structural repairs, maintenance, management, operation, reasonable returns and interest on such outlay at such rates as the state government may fix until the full amount of such outlay is recovered. (4) the toll levied ..... regards the same. (vide: state of orissa v. madan gopal rungta, air 1952 sc 12; saghir ahmad and anr. v. state of u. p., air 1954 sc 728; calcutta gas company (proprietary) ltd. v. state of west bengal and ors., air 1962 sc 1044; rajendra singh v. state of madhya pradesh, air 1996 sc 2736: (1996) ..... , 2011 is not in consonance with section 20 of the above act. in that regard, he submits that the notification states that all the newly constructed bridges, roads, railway fly overs etc. will be deemed to be 'single unit' for the purposes of section 20, whereas section 20(1 d) provides as follows: (1 d) where .....

A.K. Gopalan Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC27; 1950CriLJ1383; (1950)IIMLJ42(SC); [1950]1SCR88

..... only subjectively as applied to a few individuals who come within their operations but also objectively as securing the liberty of a far greater number of individuals. social interest in individual liberty may well have to be subordinated to ..... of construction. further, the circumstances and the class or classes of cases may conceivably coalesce. indeed the full bench case no. 1 of 1950 before the calcutta high court (kshitindra narayan v. the chief secretary) itself indicates that the same provision may be read as circumstances or as a classification. in that ..... one person is really securing the liberty of the intended victims. to curb the freedom of the saboteur of surreptitiously removing the fish plates from the railway lines is to ensure the safety and liberty of movement of the numerously innocent and unsuspecting passengers. therefore, restraints on liberty should be judged not .....

Emperor Vs. J.K. Gas Plant Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1947Bom361; (1947)49BOMLR352

..... for the petitioners, takes exception to proposition b(2), and contends that the ordinances regarding matters enumerated in the federal and concurrent legislative lists cease to be operative six months after the revocation of the proclamation of emergency. his contention finds some support in a recent (still unreported) decision of the madras high court ..... ordinance (xxix of 1943), on september 11, 1943. section 3 of that ordinance empowered the central government to constitute two special tribunals, one to sit at calcutta and the other at lahore, and under section 5, such tribunals were given jurisdiction to try eases allotted to them in the first schedule to the ordinance ..... the ordinance has continued to be in force with respect to matters enumerated in the federal legislative list.34. it is, however, obvious that rampur railway station being outside british india, the governor general could not constitute a tribunal to try an offence committed there and the allotment of the trial of that .....