Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 5 carriage of goods Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 873 results (0.528 seconds)

Von Baumbach Vs. Sargent Land Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... organized for profit, there can be no difficulty. they certainly do not come within the exceptional character of charitable or eleemosynary organizations excepted from the operation of the act. we need not dwell upon the obvious purpose of these corporations, organized under the provisions of the minnesota statute concerning companies ..... part of the land for schoolhouse purposes, as well as another part for a public park. to insure the proper carrying on of the mining operations, the companies employed another corporation, engaged in engineering and inspection of ore properties, to provide supervision and inspection of the work upon the respondents' ..... besides receiving and distributing among their shareholders the royalties from a number of outstanding long-term "mining leases," employed another company to inspect the lessees' operations and keep them to their contracts, made some mining explorations at expense on other parts of their properties, sold or leased other parcels and sold .....

Cumberland Tel. and Tel. Co. Vs. Louisiana P.S.C.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for the eastern district of louisiana syllabus 1. upon appeal from an order merely refusing a preliminary injunction, under jud.code 266, there is nothing upon which a supersedeas may operate. p. 260 u. s. 215 . 2. under jud.code, 266, a single judge, in allowing an appeal from an order of the district court, constituted of three judges, ..... issued a mandamus directing him to annul the order of vacation. we are of opinion that a single judge has no power, in view of 266, to affect the operation of the order of the court constituted by the three judges granting or denying the interlocutory injunction applied for. to hold that he may grant a temporary injunction varying ..... judges who have heard the whole matter, have read the record, and can pass on the issue without additional labor. that was the course taken by this court in southern railway co. v. watts, 259 u.s. 576. a similar order will be made here. the action of the district court thus constituted, however, will not revive or vitalize .....

Trinityfarm Construction Co. Vs. Grosjean

Court : US Supreme Court

..... no room for any distinction between the plant so employed and the gasoline used to generate power. if the payment of state taxes imposed on the property and operations of appellant affects the federal government at all, it at most gives rise to a burden which is consequential and remote, and not to one that is necessary ..... arises out of our dual government. it has often been given effect. [ footnote 2 ] and, reciprocally, it safeguards every state against federal tax on its governmental agencies or operations. [ footnote 3 ] its application does not depend upon the amount of the exaction, the weight of the burden, or the extent of the resulting interference with sovereign independence ..... states for the construction of levees in louisiana to control the waters of page 291 u. s. 470 the mississippi river. it consumes much gasoline in the operation of machinery employed to do the work. it imports its supply from other states in carload lots and places it in a central tank from which distribution .....

Emperor Vs. J.K. Gas Plant Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1947Bom361; (1947)49BOMLR352

..... for the petitioners, takes exception to proposition b(2), and contends that the ordinances regarding matters enumerated in the federal and concurrent legislative lists cease to be operative six months after the revocation of the proclamation of emergency. his contention finds some support in a recent (still unreported) decision of the madras high court ..... ordinance (xxix of 1943), on september 11, 1943. section 3 of that ordinance empowered the central government to constitute two special tribunals, one to sit at calcutta and the other at lahore, and under section 5, such tribunals were given jurisdiction to try eases allotted to them in the first schedule to the ordinance ..... the ordinance has continued to be in force with respect to matters enumerated in the federal legislative list.34. it is, however, obvious that rampur railway station being outside british india, the governor general could not constitute a tribunal to try an offence committed there and the allotment of the trial of that .....

Ram Kishan Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All181

..... institution or body of its own creation, authority to make by-laws or resolutions as to subjects specified in the enactment, & with the object of carrying the enactment into operation & effect.it is obvious that such an authority is ancillary to legislation, & without it an attempt to provide for varying details & machinery to carry them out might become ..... those aspects of the question which do not appear to have been placed before that ct. in the case of jatindra, nath gupta . in accordance with view expressed by the calcutta h. ct. the madras h. c. & the d. b. of this ct., in the cases referred to in an earlier part of this judgment, regarding the ..... would thus appear that the principles enunciated by the majority of the f. c. in the case of jatindra nath gupta, have been followed by division benches of calcutta, madras & allahabad high courts in determining the question whether or not similar provisions in security acts of those provinces relating to an extension of the life of an act .....

A.K. Gopalan Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC27; 1950CriLJ1383; (1950)IIMLJ42(SC); [1950]1SCR88

..... only subjectively as applied to a few individuals who come within their operations but also objectively as securing the liberty of a far greater number of individuals. social interest in individual liberty may well have to be subordinated to ..... of construction. further, the circumstances and the class or classes of cases may conceivably coalesce. indeed the full bench case no. 1 of 1950 before the calcutta high court (kshitindra narayan v. the chief secretary) itself indicates that the same provision may be read as circumstances or as a classification. in that ..... one person is really securing the liberty of the intended victims. to curb the freedom of the saboteur of surreptitiously removing the fish plates from the railway lines is to ensure the safety and liberty of movement of the numerously innocent and unsuspecting passengers. therefore, restraints on liberty should be judged not .....

The Bangalore District Hotel Owners' Association Vs. the District Magi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1951Kant14; AIR1951Mys14

..... carry on any occupation, trade or business. under sub-clause (6) of that article it is provided that nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevents the state from making any law imposing in the interests of the general public reasonable restrictions on the ..... a case of an application for the issue of a writ of mandamus, the applicant claimed that in consequence of his appointment for two years as a lecturer in the calcutta university he was entitled to receive certain remuneration, but that after the first year the governor-general in council had refused to sanction his appointment and the senate had declined .....

Mulchand Bulakhidas Vs. Arya Bandhu Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal424,57CWN236

..... applied for review of this judgment but the said application was dismissed on 6-8-1949. on 10-5-1950 after the rent control act 1950 had come into operation the tenant applied for re-fixation of standard rent under section 17(2) of this latter act and in support of his contention that the standard rent should be ..... was not maintainable in law. i am unable to accept this extreme contention. it is true that the original application for fixation of the standard rent was made under the calcutta rent ordinance 1940 and on that application the rent controller standardised the rent at rs. 425/- per month on 15-7-1948. true also that in the appeal which ..... landlord and the opposite party the tenant under him in respect of the disputed premises, viz., a shop room in the ground floor of premises no, 191, harrison road, calcutta. this tenancy commenced sometime in the year 1945 and the contractual rent was rs. 500/- per month.3. on 22-2-1948 the tenant-opposite party applied for standardisation of .....

Sashibhusan Pati Vs. Mangala Biswal

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1953Ori171

..... commencement of the impugned act have been made practically non-executable and to that limited extent retrospective operation has been given to the impugned act. in support of this argument reliance was placed on a division bench decision of the calcutta high court reported in -- 'subodh g6pal v, behari lal', air 1951 cal 85 (k ..... high court distinguished the earlier decision and held that the provisions of the west bengal rent control (amendment) act of 1950 which were in terms retrospective in operation and applicable to pending cases were not unreasonable. therefore there is no general rule of law that the provisions of any act which have limited retrospective effect ..... and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities and in particular, the state shall endeavour to promote cottage industries on an individual or co-operative basis in rural areas.' the bhag-chasis are undoubtedly agricultural works and on account of the high rate of produce rent which they were required to .....

Huzrat Syed Shah Mustarshid Ali Al Quadari Vs. Commr. of Wakfs and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1954Cal436

..... acted under the rules, the petitioner will pay his costs but otherwise there will be no order as to costs. the interim orders will be vacated. the operation of the order is stayed for 3 weeks. any further stay must be obtained from the court of appeal, if there is an appeal. writs of ..... his powers, duties or functions, except those conferred by some sections specified'.the learned advocate-general points out that the distinction lies in the fact that under section 34, calcutta municipal act not only 'powers' and 'duties' can be delegated but also 'functions', which would attract subjective satisfaction. mr. mitter also refers to section 11(1) ..... and yet they contain provisions for delegation. mr. mitter appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 gave a number of instances. he pointed out various sections of the calcutta municipal act, 1951 which required the subjective satisfaction of the commissioner viz. section 210(3) (if satisfied), section 288 (has reason to believe), section 325 (if .....