Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 5 carriage of goods Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 3 results (0.166 seconds)

May 10 2000 (HC)

Suresh Chandra Sharma and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT12; 2000(2)MPLJ530

..... duties imposed under sub-section (1) a council shall, in times of distress such as outbreak of an epidemic or famine or other natural calamity, render such assistance and co-operation as the state government may require for the following matters, namely:--(a) providing special medical aid and accommodation for the sick;(b) giving relief to and establishing and maintaining relief ..... works, baths, washing places, drinking fountains, tanks, wells, dams and the like;(k) establishing and managing cattle pounds, including where the cattle trespass act, 1871 (1 of 1871), is in operation, all the function of the state government and the magistrate of the district under sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 14, 17 and 19 of that act;(l) obtaining a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1994 (HC)

All India Motor Transport Congress and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Prades ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1994MP117; 1994(0)MPLJ884

..... picture at all. the toll is compensatory in nature and does not restrict trade, commerce and intercourse and is utilised for providing facilities for smooth operation of transport business by developing, maintaining and regulating roads, bridges and other means of transportation necessary for the trade, commerce and intercourse. the toll ..... by the state transport authority. to encourage the long distance and inter-state transport of goods by roads and to regulate, co-ordinate and control their operation a reciprocal agreement was entered into between states of gujarat, haryana, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, punjab, rajasthan, uttar pradesh and delhi. under the reciprocal ..... enables the transport authority of the state to countersign a permit of the other state so that the permit issued outside the state will be operative within the state. sub-section(11) of section 63 provides that notwithstanding the requirement of countersignature, the appropriate authority, for the purposes of encouraging .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2008 (HC)

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... detract from the said freedom. before a particular law can be said to infringe the said freedom, it must be ascertained whether the impugned provision operates as a restriction impeding the free movement of trade or only as a regulation facilitating the same. restrictions obstruct the freedom, whereas regulations promote it ..... that in view of the judgment in the case of jindal stainless : [2006]283itr1(sc) overruling the whole judgment, including both the reasoning and operative portion, in the case of bhagatram rajeev kumar : 1994(4)scale1103 , the entry tax levied by the impugned act has been rendered unconstitutional as it ..... of increasing the rate of tax tantamounts to excessive delegation as essential legislative functions have been delegated. reliance has been placed on the decisions rendered in corporation of calcutta v. liberty cinema : [1965]2scr477 , vasantlal maganbhai sanjanwala v. state of bombay : 1978crilj1281 and municipal corporation of delhi v. birla cotton, spinning and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //