Cable Service - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: cable service Page 1 of about 3 results (0.008 seconds)Scod 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd Vs. United Cable Services
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
advertisement code and/or Programme code as set out in the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1944 or any other law for the requirements of Clause 3.3 of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Regulations, 2004 as amended from time to time (the Regulations).
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishan Dabas vs.sapphire Cables & Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
both the impugned order that the appellant were serving as cable operators. The learned Single Judge held that reinstatement of the common order.2. The appellants were serving with the respondents-Reliance Integrated Services Pvt. Ltd in the case of the appellant-Man Singh, and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishan Dabas vs.m/s Sapphire Cables & Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
of the compensation.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as a Cable Operator on 04th April, 2003. The respondent terminated the petitioner Kharb, Ms.Ritu Raj Kumari, Advocates versus M/S SAPPHIRE CABLES & SERVICES PVT LTD..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jayant K. Mehta, Mr.Manikya Harpalani, Khanna,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>