C N - Judgment Search Results

C.N. Suresh vs C.N. Sujith

Court: Kerala

25TH JYAISHTA, 1945 I.A.NO.1881/2022 IN O.S.NO.136/2018 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: C.N. SURESH, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O C. NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT PALAPPALLAM VEEDU, MUTTIMAMBALAM, KEERIKKADAN PADI, KOZHINJAMBARA POST, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 678555, NOW RESIDING NEAR … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 25TH

C.N.Krishnan vs C.N.Govindarajulu

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 07.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE

C.N. Setty Vs. Hillock Hotels (P.) Ltd. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2000]37CLA263(AP); [2001]104CompCas722(AP); (2000)1CompLJ181(AP)

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. O. S. A. No. 40 of 1999 is filed by the respondents in Company Petition No. 27 of 1988 (reported as C.N. Shetty v. Hillock Hotels Pvt. Ltd. [1996J 87 Comp Cas

A.S. Krishna Murthy S/O Late Srinivasan Vs. C.N. Revanna S/O C.R. Naga ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2009(5)KarLJ454; 2009(4)AIRKarR486; AIR2009NOC2692(D.B)

B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. W.A. No. 740/2006 is filed by plaintiff No. 2 in O.S. no. 15842/1999 challenging the order dated 27.3.2006 made by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 26457/2005.2. RFA. No. 389/2007 is … B.V. Nagarathna, J.1. W.A. No. 740/2006 is filed by plaintiff No. 2 in O.S. no. 15842/1999 challenging the order dated

C.N. Malla Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2739; JT2009(11)SC1; (2009)IVLLJ667SC; 2009(11)SCALE581; (2009)9SCC597:2009AIRSCW5459

Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. In this appeal by special leave, the only question that is required to be considered is whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in setting aside the order of the … for extension of leave for undergoing further training and seeking service in foreign country but his representations were not responded to by the state government and his services were illegally terminated without following the procedure prescribed in

C.N. Anantharam. Vs. M/S Fiat India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

October, 2002, the Petitioner herein purchased a Fiat Siena Weekender diesel vehicle from M/s Sundaram Automobiles, Bangalore, the common Respondent in all these three Special Leave Petitions and agent of M/s Fiat India Ltd., the manufacturer of … sum of Rs.56,537/- towards lifetime road tax and Rs.28,964/- as insurance. The vehicle was duly registered in the name of the Petitioner on 25th November, 2002, when the vehicle was delivered.2. According to the Petitioner, immediately after

C.N.Ramappa Gowda Vs. C.C.Chaqndergowda (D) by Lrs.and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, J.1. The impugned order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in R.F.A.No. 597/2004 is under challenge in this appeal after grant of special leave … the trial court?(ii) Further question which is related to the issue is whether the defendants-respondents who had chosen not to file written statement in spite of several opportunities granted by the trial court, could be granted fresh

C.N. Ramappa Gowda Vs. C.C. Chandregowda (Dead) by Lrs. and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012(5)SCC265; 2012(2)KLT92(SN)(C.No.86); 2012(3)LW326; AIR2012SCW2510,2012(4)SCJ991; AIR2012SC2528; 2012(5)ALD1; 2012(3)KCCR117(SN); 2012(3)BCR640; 2012(6)KarLJ1; 2012(5)MLJ611; 2012(2)CLT243; 2012(3)SLT364

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, J.The impugned order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in R.F.A.No. 597/2004 is under challenge in this appeal after grant of special leave … the trial court?(ii) Further question which is related to the issue is whether the defendants-respondents who had chosen not to file written statement in spite of several opportunities granted by the trial court, could be granted fresh

C.N.Paramsivan and anr Vs. Sunrise Plaza Tr.Partner and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.154 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.21765 of 2010) C.N.

C.N. Rudramurthy Vs. K. Barkathulla Khan and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC110; 1998(5)SCALE485; (1998)8SCC275; [1998]Supp2SCR196; 1999(1)LC27(SC)

original tenant in occupation of a premises bearing No. 199 and 200 situated at Brigade Road in Bangalore city for recovery of possession thereof on the ground that he had defaulted in payment of rent and had … Babu, J.1. The appellant filed a suit against Bhaskaran, the original tenant in occupation of a premises bearing No. 199 and 200 situated at Brigade Road in Bangalore city for recovery of possession thereof on the ground