By Product - Judgment Search Results

Corn Products Refining Co. Vs. Shangrila Food Products Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1960SC142; (1960)62BOMLR162; [1960]1SCR968

appellant wherein it was stated that 'Glucovita is a well-known mark in the trade' and denoted only the products of the appellant. We think that the learned appellate Judges put too strict a meaning on the words

R.K. Products Vs. Kothari Products Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2809; [2005]126CompCas858(All); 2005(31)PTC393(All)

an order dated 17.10.2003, passed by District Judge, Kanpur Nagar in Original Suit No. 11 of 2003. Kothari Products v. R.K. Products, allowing application No. 5 (c) granting temporary injunction in favour of respondent restraining the appellant,

Babul Products Private Ltd. Vs. Zen Products

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)3GLR2309; 2005(31)PTC135(Guj)

ORDERAt this stage Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate for the appellant requested that the interim relief may be extended for a period of four weeks. Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior Advocate for the respondent has objected to...

Rani Food Products Vs. Stine Food Products

Court: Chennai

02/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA O.A.Nos.426 and 427 of 2011 in C.S.No.330 of 2011 RANI FOOD PRODUCTS VS STINE FOOD PRODUCTS FOR PETITIONER : K.Rajasekaran FOR RESPONDENT : G.Ramji ORDER: VINOD K. SHARMA,J., O.A.No.426 of

National Food Products Vs. Madras Food Products and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(1)BomCR105

maintained by the respondents No. 2-the Registrar of trade marks.2. The petitioner amongst other things, produces a bakery product viz., bread. The package of the bread manufactured by the petitioner which bears the trade mark 'Picnic bread'

Vijayalakshmi Art Productions Vs. Vijaya Productions Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1997]88CompCas353(Mad); 1996(2)CTC396

April 8, 1994. The question of limitation looms large in this petition. 2. The petitioner, Sri Vijayalakshmi Art Production, a registered partnership firm, claims to have advanced to the respondent company between July 2, 1985, and March

Balsara Hygience Products Vs. Consumer Products Distributors

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1. In its application filed before the Commission, M/s, Balsara Products Distributors Association has charged the Consumer Products Distributors Association (hereinafter referred as R-1), Shri Nanjibhai Thanewala, President, Consumer

Amalco Herbal Products Vs. Three-n-products Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

as a trade mark for the family business of the review petitioner for manufacturing and selling its ayurvedic products including the Ayurvedic pharmaceutical products like tooth powder, thali powder, rasanthi powder, etc; that the impugned mark has

Three-n-products Private Limited Vs. Amalco Herbal Products

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Act as much as, the trade mark AYUR was never used by the registered proprietor in respect of products falling under class 05. (b) That the word AYURGREEN has been copied from the registered trade mark AYUR

Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. and Another Vs. M/s. Arokya Food Products and ...

Court: Chennai

by itself, its agents, servants or any one claiming through it from in any manner passing off its products as that of the applicant by using the offending trademark ''AROKYA'' or any other trademark which is similar