By Pass - Judgment Search Results

Narinder Mohan Pass Vs. General Manager Northern Railway

Court: Supreme Court of India

contended by the counsel for the petitioners. It is purely an executive power. Therefore, the Railway Board which passed that order whether it had power to retrospectively mofify that order or not, had power to interpert the

Pass Code Hospitality Private Limited (Prop. of Regd. Trademark Jamun) ...

Court: Delhi

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 64/2026 PASS CODE HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED (PROP. OF REGD. TRADEMARK JAMUN) .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sumeher Bajaj and Ms. Lakshmi Kailasan,

Passing Gagrai Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No.236 of 2011 ----- Passing Gagrai ... .... .... .... .... Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... .... Respondent -----

Passed in Union of India and ors. Vs. Ultra Tech Cement

Court: Kolkata

OtheRs.b) Unreported judgement dated 27th January, 2010 delivered in the appeal against the judgement dated 30th July, 2009 passed in Union of India & ORS.Versus Ultra Tech Cement LTD.& Anr. c) The judgement dated 19th December, 2007

Ganga Parshad Tiwari Vs. Khyber Pass Mess Hostel Committee and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2007(112)FLR933]

of Industrial Disputes Act claiming an amount of Rs.1,02,451/- from the respondent based on an award dated 14.12.1989 passed by Labour Court-VII, Tis Hazari, management whereby he was directed to be reinstated with full back wages and

Durgempudi Venkata Raghava Vs. Pass Port Officer

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(1)ALD710; 2005(1)ALT751

the mistake committed in mentioning the date of birth of petitioner as 10-8-1968 instead of 10-8-1969 in the Passport No. M.729849, dated 10-11-1992 at Hyderabad, and direct the respondent to enter the date of birth of the

In Re: Arbitral Award Dated 25th June, 2007 Passed by the Sole Arbitra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)BomCR775

filed by respondent Nos. 2 to 5.20(A). Faced with this, Mr. Shah relied upon an order dated 14.6.2007 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Appeal No. 388 of 2007 in the said Arbitration Petition

“ in Compliance of the Order Passed by This Court Vs. State of Punja ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

not by the competent authority. This case came up for hearing on 22.1.2013 when the following order was passed :- “ Counsel for the petitioner states that the criteria which has been reproduced in para 18 of

“a Perusal of Judgment Passed by Court Below Shows Vs. Smt. Pushpa L ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

GUPTA Present: Mr.Nitin Kumar, Advocate for the petitioneRs.RAJAN GUPTA J. Present revision petition is directed against the order passed by executing court dismissing the objections preferred by petitioners-judgment debtORS.Learned counsel for the petitioners has assailed the order

on 28.01.2013 the Following Order Was Passed:- Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral).On 28.01.2013 the following order was passed:- “The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.287 dated 22.11.2011, under Sections 420, 120-B of