Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

By Drinking - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 1993

Pure Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. (Asstt. Ci ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-03-1993

Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)225

Estate, Bombay measuring 17,907. 6 sq. mts. In part of this plot, it had its factory, where soft drinks were manufactured and on the other part, it had residential flats for its employees. The assessed-company approached the


Mar 04 1996

Pepsi Foods Vs. Jai Drinks (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-04-1996

Reported in: 1996(36)DRJ711

been filed by 'PEPSI' for declaration, injection and rendition of accounts. Suit No.2110/92 has been filed by Jai Drinks Private Limited (In short referred to as 'JAI') against Pepsi Foods Limited for declaration and for recovery of


May 22 2014

Kreem Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-22-2014

CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE22D DAY OF MAY20141ST JYAISHTA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12858 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- KREEM DRINKS PVT. LTD, CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AROOR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER REENA.K. BY ADVS.SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P RESPONDENT(S):


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2026

Royal Drink Xpurt vs Ms Central Secretariat Club

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-25-2026

decision: 25.02.2026 + ARB.P. 112/2026 & I.A. 1125/2026 (Delay of 138 days in Re- filing the petition) ROYAL DRINK XPURT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pragya Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Nikhil Anand, AdvocatesversusMS CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB .....Respondent Through: Appearance


Nov 17 2004

Fizz Drinks Limited Vs. the Labour Court (2) and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-17-2004

Reported in: [2005(104)FLR1196]; (2005)1UPLBEC595

of Accountant on salary of Rs. 1,000/- per month on temporary basis at petitioner's Company, namely, M/s. Fizz Drinks Ltd., Faridabad and was deputed to work at Meerut in the Sales Department of the Company. The salary


Mar 15 2001

Fizz Drinks P. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-15-2001

Reported in: [2001]123STC183(P& H)

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the orders, annexures P1 and P3, passed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (1)-cum-Revisional Authority, Faridabad (East) (respondent No. 3) and the Sales Tax...


Dec 07 2005

Pure Drinks Limited and ors. Vs. Project Investments Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-07-2005

Reported in: 2006(86)DRJ482

Mrs. Surinder, Judge is the daughter of late Sardar Mohan Singh, who was the founder of the Pure Drinks Group. Mr. Parag Tripathi, learned senior counsel, states that there are two orders passed by this Court on


Jan 31 2002

Manager, Jai Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-31-2002

Reported in: [2002(95)FLR931]

case of the petitioner (for short 'the Company') is that it has a bottling plant for bottling soft drinks at Jaipur. Non-petitioner No. 2 was in the employment of the Company's bottling plant as waterman, who was


May 28 2002

Jai Drinks (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-28-2002

Reported in: [2002]258ITR645(Raj)

remain the same, therefore, they are being heard and decided together.2. The assessee-company was manufacturing and selling soft drinks under a licence issued by Coca-Cola Export Corporation, USA. For the manufacture of the soft drinks, the concentrate


May 28 2002

Jai Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-28-2002

Reported in: (2002)178CTR(Raj)42

the same, therefore, they are being heard and decided together .2. The assessee-company was manufacturing and selling soft drinks under a licence issued by M/s Coca-Cola Export Corporation, USA. For the manufacture of the soft drinks, the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial