By Drinking - Judgment Search Results
Pure Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. (Asstt. Ci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-03-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)225
part of this plot, it had its factory, where soft drinks were manufactured and on the other part, it had residential
Pepsi Foods Vs. Jai Drinks (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-1996
Reported in: 1996(36)DRJ711
rendition of accounts. Suit No.2110/92 has been filed by Jai Drinks Private Limited (In short referred to as 'JAI') against Pepsi
Kreem Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-22-2014
WP(C).No. 12858 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- KREEM DRINKS PVT. LTD, CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AROOR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Royal Drink Xpurt vs Ms Central Secretariat Club
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
(Delay of 138 days in Re- filing the petition) ROYAL DRINK XPURT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pragya Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Nikhil
Fizz Drinks Limited Vs. the Labour Court (2) and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-17-2004
Reported in: [2005(104)FLR1196]; (2005)1UPLBEC595
month on temporary basis at petitioner's Company, namely, M/s. Fizz Drinks Ltd., Faridabad and was deputed to work at Meerut in
Fizz Drinks P. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: [2001]123STC183(P& H)
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the orders, annexures P1 and P3, passed by the...
Pure Drinks Limited and ors. Vs. Project Investments Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(86)DRJ482
Sardar Mohan Singh, who was the founder of the Pure Drinks Group. Mr. Parag Tripathi, learned senior counsel, states that there
Manager, Jai Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-31-2002
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR931]
is that it has a bottling plant for bottling soft drinks at Jaipur. Non-petitioner No. 2 was in the employment of
Jai Drinks (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-28-2002
Reported in: [2002]258ITR645(Raj)
and decided together.2. The assessee-company was manufacturing and selling soft drinks under a licence issued by Coca-Cola Export Corporation, USA. For
Jai Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)178CTR(Raj)42
decided together .2. The assessee-company was manufacturing and selling soft drinks under a licence issued by M/s Coca-Cola Export Corporation, USA.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free