But For - Judgment Search Results
Rajah Damara Kumara Venkatappa Nayanim Bahadur Varu (Late a Minor but ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-1915
Reported in: (1916)ILR39Mad772
John Wallis, C.J. 1. The plaintiff-appellant in this case bases his claim to succeed to the estate of the late Gangadbara Rama Nayanim on the ground that he was duly adopted by the junior widow with...
interest but the Respondents Have Failed to Discharge Vs. Sub Division ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1135 of 2003(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2014 Central Bank of India ..Petitioner Versus Sub Divisional Officer (Civil).Ambala and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
Keeping in View All the Circumstances but Without Meaning to Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
Criminal Misc. not M-30 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-30 of 2013 Date of decision : February 01, 2013 Sanjay Kathuria ....Petitioner versus State of...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
by the Petitioner. there Can Be Thus No Escape but Vs. --respondents
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
LPA No.125 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.125 of 2011 Date of Decision:20.3.2013 Punjab State Power Corporation Limited --Appellant versus Telu Ram and another --Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF...
“no Doubt That the Law for Amendment of Plaint Quite Liberal but at ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
Civil Revision No.3884 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3884 of 2012 Date of Decision:- 3.3.2014 Manjit Singh ......Petitioner Versus Punjab Kaur & Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...
Mahamani Vs. the Union of India Rep. but Its Secretary Ministry of Hom ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)CTC44
ORDERJudgement pronounced by V. Bakthavatsalu, J. (for Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Dhinakar & for himself)1. The Division Bench consisting of V.S. Sirpurkar, J and K.Gnanaprakasam, J have formulated the following question for reference to Full Bench:'When...
A.N. Subramanian, Late a Minor by G.S. Lakshmi Ammal, as Next Friend b ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Mad22; (1952)2MLJ575
Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The appellant is the plaintiff in a suit for partition and separate possession in respect of the properties of his grand father one Subramania Iyer. Subramania Iyer had two sons, the first defendant...
Neelam P. Chawla Vs. Godavari V. Nagpal (Since Deceased but Never Disc ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
R.C. Jain, Presiding Member: 1. Challenge in these proceedings is to the order dated 28.11.2007 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer' Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai in M.A. No. 2049 of 2007 (Execution application) and M.A. No....
T.S. Swaminatha Odayar, Lately a Minor by Guardian Meenakshi Achi but ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-09-1938
Reported in: (1938)2MLJ704
ORDER1. The point to decide is whether the amount in question was borrowed and expended on behalf of the family. The books of the institution containing the necessary entries were in the High Court. The claimant...
Arumuga Bathan, Lately a Minor but Since Declared Major and Guardian a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-15-1936
Reported in: AIR1936Mad814; 163Ind.Cas.704; (1936)70MLJ719
King, J.1. The land which forms the subject-matter of this appeal was in 1917 in the possession of defendant 1. He mortgaged it in that year by Ex. B a simple mortgage deed to defendant 3....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free