Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

But For - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 1915

Rajah Damara Kumara Venkatappa Nayanim Bahadur Varu (Late a Minor but ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-29-1915

Reported in: (1916)ILR39Mad772

John Wallis, C.J. 1. The plaintiff-appellant in this case bases his claim to succeed to the estate of the late Gangadbara Rama Nayanim on the ground that he was duly adopted by the junior widow with...


May 20 2014

interest but the Respondents Have Failed to Discharge Vs. Sub Division ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-20-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1135 of 2003(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2014 Central Bank of India ..Petitioner Versus Sub Divisional Officer (Civil).Ambala and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...


Feb 01 2013

Keeping in View All the Circumstances but Without Meaning to Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

Criminal Misc. not M-30 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-30 of 2013 Date of decision : February 01, 2013 Sanjay Kathuria ....Petitioner versus State of...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 20 2013

by the Petitioner. there Can Be Thus No Escape but Vs. --respondents

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-20-2013

LPA No.125 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.125 of 2011 Date of Decision:20.3.2013 Punjab State Power Corporation Limited --Appellant versus Telu Ram and another --Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF...


Mar 03 2014

“no Doubt That the Law for Amendment of Plaint Quite Liberal but at ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-03-2014

Civil Revision No.3884 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3884 of 2012 Date of Decision:- 3.3.2014 Manjit Singh ......Petitioner Versus Punjab Kaur & Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...


Dec 07 1999

Mahamani Vs. the Union of India Rep. but Its Secretary Ministry of Hom ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-07-1999

Reported in: 2000(1)CTC44

ORDERJudgement pronounced by V. Bakthavatsalu, J. (for Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Dhinakar & for himself)1. The Division Bench consisting of V.S. Sirpurkar, J and K.Gnanaprakasam, J have formulated the following question for reference to Full Bench:'When...


Jul 30 1952

A.N. Subramanian, Late a Minor by G.S. Lakshmi Ammal, as Next Friend b ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-30-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Mad22; (1952)2MLJ575

Krishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The appellant is the plaintiff in a suit for partition and separate possession in respect of the properties of his grand father one Subramania Iyer. Subramania Iyer had two sons, the first defendant...


Jul 09 2012

Neelam P. Chawla Vs. Godavari V. Nagpal (Since Deceased but Never Disc ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Jul-09-2012

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member: 1. Challenge in these proceedings is to the order dated 28.11.2007 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer' Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai in M.A. No. 2049 of 2007 (Execution application) and M.A. No....


May 09 1938

T.S. Swaminatha Odayar, Lately a Minor by Guardian Meenakshi Achi but ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-09-1938

Reported in: (1938)2MLJ704

ORDER1. The point to decide is whether the amount in question was borrowed and expended on behalf of the family. The books of the institution containing the necessary entries were in the High Court. The claimant...


Feb 15 1936

Arumuga Bathan, Lately a Minor but Since Declared Major and Guardian a ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-15-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Mad814; 163Ind.Cas.704; (1936)70MLJ719

King, J.1. The land which forms the subject-matter of this appeal was in 1917 in the possession of defendant 1. He mortgaged it in that year by Ex. B a simple mortgage deed to defendant 3....


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial