Brownfields - Judgment Search Results

Brownfield Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... carolina 189 u s 426 1903 u s supreme court brownfield v south carolina 189 u s 426 1903 brownfield v south carolina no 172 argued february 25 1903 decided march 9 .....

Medx (Randburg) (Pty) Ltd. Vs. Andrew Shaun Branfield

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

on appeal from a full court of the south gauteng high court johannesburg tsoka j with carelse j and d...

Ramchandra Yeshwant Shringarpure Vs. Digambar Tejiram Pardeshiu and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR1665

chainani c j 1 whether an order for set off passed under order xxi rule 72 can be called upon...

Communication Components Antenna Inc. Vs.ace Technologies Corp. And Or ...

Court: Delhi

..... before the european patent office the replacement is physical it can apply only to a brownfield project the use of terms such as replacement upgradation and comparison with the original clearly ..... area is used would be clearly attracted the difference thus sought to be urged between brownfield and greenfield use is based on a misinterpretation of the claims 63 the question as .....

Empire of India Life Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. S. Nanu Ayyar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1921Mad309; (1921)ILR44Mad170

..... to receive anything bowen l j and kay l j concurred 11 salumon v brownfield and the brownfield guild pottery society 1896 12 t l r 239 is a case tried at ..... r 677 boyd v mathers 1903 19 t l r 554 and saloumon v brownfield and the brownfield guild pottery society 1896 12 t l r 239 were brought to the notice .....

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... mega power policy available to greenfield projects would also be available to expansion unit s brownfield projects even if the total capacity of expansion unit s is less than the threshold ..... tripura 17 e government has decided to extend mega policy benefits to brownfield expansion projects also in case of the brownfield expansion phase of the existing mega project size of the expansion .....

Empire of India Life Assurance Co. Limited Vs. S. Nanu Aiyar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 60Ind.Cas.69; (1920)39MLJ577

..... not to receive anything bowen l j and kay l j concurred 10 salomon v brownfield 1896 12 t l r 239 is a case tried at nisi prius by mathew ..... l r 677 byod v mathers 1898 9 t l rs 443 and salomon v brownfield 1896 12 t l r 239 were brought to the notice of the court the .....

Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court: Delhi

..... the end use restrictions for existing excluding ppp and future greenfield and brownfield airports of aai and future greenfield and brownfield projects under ppp xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx emphasis supplied .....

Airports Authroity Employees Union Regd No 3515 Vs. Union Of India

Court: Karnataka

..... it is humbly submitted that there is no requirement of any feasibility study for brownfield airports airports which are already in operation feasibility studies are conducted for greenfield airports ..... new airports that are to be established mangaluru airport are brownfield airport therefore there is no requirement of any feasibility study for this airport which .....

Uprichard Vs. Scottish Ministers and Another

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... strategic development area to the west of the town and will maximise the use of brownfield sites where possible a 10ha science park and a 10ha general business park will be .....