Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Broker - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 1998

Karnataka Pawn Brokers Assn. and ors., Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-29-1998

Reported in: 1998VIIIAD(SC)148; AIR1999SC201; JT1998(7)SC370; 1998(5)SCALE718; (1998)7SCC707; [1998]Supp2SCR461; [1998]111STC752(SC)

sold in auction containing the following particulars printed:-(a)the name, place of business and licence number of the pawn broker concerned; (b)date of loan; (c)number of the pledge in the pledge book; (d)full and detailed description of the


Jan 25 1994

Karnataka Pawn Brokers

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-1994

Reported in: 1995Supp(3)SCC246

challenge was to the constitutional validity of Sections 4-A and 4-B introduced by amendment in the Karnataka Pawn Brokers Act, 1961 and Sections 7-A and 7-B introduced by similar amendment in the Karnataka Moneylenders Act, 1961. These


Mar 04 2015

Jrd Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-04-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :04. 03.2015 + ITA1342014, C.M. APPL.5666/2014 JRD STOCK BROKERS (P) LTD. ……Appellant Through: Sh. R.P. Garg, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ……Respondent Through: Sh. Kamal Sawhney,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2015

Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Roshanara Bhinder

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-16-2015

of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (for short the said MCX) and carries on business as commodity brokers. The respondent was registered with the petitioner as the constituent and was executing transactions for sale and purchase


Apr 26 2016

Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Roshanara Bhinder

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

is a trading member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. ('MCX'), carrying on business as a commodity broker. The Respondent is a constituent of the Appellant, carrying on business of sale and purchase of commodities, under


Mar 14 2016

Way2Wealth Brokers Pvt Ltd. Vs. C.B. Sharma

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-14-2016

Stock Exchanges for Arbitration of Disputes (Claims, Complaints, differences etc.) arising between a client and a member (Stock Broker, Trading Member and Clearing Member) across various market segments. The arbitration mechanism and the Regulations issued by Circular


Feb 06 2017

Unicorn Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-06-2017

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h February, 2017. CS(OS) 1085/2007 UNICORN INSURANCE BROKERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mohd. Amanullah and Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Advs.


May 06 2005

Assam Tea Brokers (P.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: May-06-2005

limited company engaged in the business of sale of tea in Gauhati Tea Auction Centre as a registered broker. It is also a registered dealer with the Superintendent of Taxes, Unit-A, Guwahati, under the Act. The petitioner


Aug 07 2006

Lorry Broker Union Association Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-07-2006

Reported in: [2006(4)JCR507a(Jhr)]

Matched in: Parties Lorry Broker Union Association Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors.


Dec 18 2007

Brokers and Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Om Prakash Bhola and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-18-2007

Reported in: 2008(100)DRJ696

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This is an application for impleadment. The applicant (Mr S.N. Arora) seeks impleadment on the ground that he is both a necessary and proper party. According to the applicant, he entered into...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial