Broadcaster - Judgment Search Results

Reliance Broadcast Network Limited Vs. Broadcast Engineering and Consu ...

Court: Delhi

No.1. OMP2732012:9. The case of the petitioner in this petition is that it is a private FM radio broadcaster in India and operates under the brand name “Radio One” operating in 7 Indian cities namely Mumbai, Delhi,

Reliance Broadcast Network Limited Vs. Broadcast Engineering and Consu ...

Court: Delhi

No.1. OMP2732012:9. The case of the petitioner in this petition is that it is a private FM radio broadcaster in India and operates under the brand name “Radio One” operating in 7 Indian cities namely Mumbai, Delhi,

Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. and ors. Vs. Ministry of Information and ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(2)CTLJ505(Del); 146(2008)DLT712; 2008(100)DRJ684

four hours news channel 'Aaj Tak' respectively.2. The respondent Union of India, through the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, had introduced its policy vide Notification dated 13.7.2005 regarding expansion of FM Radio Broadcasting through private agencies. The

Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8129 of 2022 Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited …Appellant Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents With Civil Appeal No.8130 of 2022 And with Civil

News Broadcasters Association Ors vs Union of India

Court: Delhi

and connected matters Page 4 of 68versusTELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through:+ W.P.(C) 4307/2021 NEWS BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION ORS .....Petitioners Through:versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:Present for Petitioners: Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Payak

Reliace Broadcast Network Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.

Court: Delhi

DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h April, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + ARB.P. 395/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Kunal Tandon & Mr.

Reliace Broadcast Network Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.

Court: Delhi

DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h April, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + ARB.P. 395/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Kunal Tandon & Mr.

Reliance Broadcast Network Limited Vs. Raj Oil Mills Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

conditional order on this petition. My reasons follow. II 3. These are the facts: (a) The petitioner, Reliance Broadcast Networks Ltd (œReliance?), conducts various on-ground activities for their clients. I understand this to mean that it organizes

Amoda Broadcasting Company Private Limit Vs. the Union of India, Minis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

petitioner would submit that any MSO registered under the Act is bound to receive transmission services from a broadcaster or its authorized agent and retransmit and arrange for simultaneous reception either to multiple subscribers directly or through

Turner Broadcasting Systems Asia Pacific Inc. Vs. Deputy Director of I ...

Court: Delhi

1874/2013 pertains to assessment year 2007-08 and WP(C) 1984/2014 pertains to assessment year 2008-09. 2. The petitioner, Turner Broadcasting Systems Asia Pacific Inc., formerly known as Turner Entertainment Networking Asia Inc. (hereinafter referred to as 'TENA') is