British Columbia - Judgment Search Results

British Columbia Electric Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the King on the Informa ...

Court: Privy Council

Company was incorporated in the United Kingdom and had its Registered Office in England. It was registered in British Columbia as an extra provincial Company under the Companies' Act, 1897, of British Columbia. Under the Companies' Act, 1929, … England. It was registered in British Columbia as an extra provincial Company under the Companies' Act, 1897, of British Columbia. Under the Companies' Act, 1929, of the United Kingdom (19 and 20 George V, Ch. 23) its Register

British Columbia Mills Tug and Barge Co. Vs. Myrolie

Court: US Supreme Court

British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co. v. Myrolie - 259 U.S. 1 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court British Columbia Mills … British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co. v. Myrolie - 259 U.S. 1 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co. v. Myrolie, 259 U.S. 1 (1922) British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Company

Montreal Trust Co.Vs. British Columbia Land and Investment Agency, Ltd ...

Court: Privy Council

president and Coulter the secretary of the company. This indenture was duly registered in the Land Registry of British Columbia. The Registrar appears to have required proof as to the authority of Nickson and Coulter to affix the

Willamette Mfg. Co. Vs. Bank of British Columbia

Court: US Supreme Court

Willamette Mfg. Co. v. Bank of British Columbia - 119 U.S. 191 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Willamette Mfg. Co. v. Bank of British Columbia, 119 U.S. … Bank of British Columbia - 119 U.S. 191 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Willamette Mfg. Co. v. Bank of British Columbia, 119 U.S. 191 (1886) Willamette Manufacturing Company v. Bank of British Columbia Argued November 9, 1886 Decided November

Attorney-general of British Columbia Vs. Attorney-general of Canada an ...

Court: Privy Council

itself, in however truncated form the whole Act is left after rejecting the other portions. Moreover counsel for British Columbia urged the Board to make a declaration that it was only so far as authority was conferred on … must be determined as matters arise under it. No such declaration was asked for from the Supreme Court. British Columbia did not even appear at the hearing in Canada : and there is no claim for such a

Attorney General of British Columbia Vs. Mcdonald Murphy Lumber Co., L ...

Court: Privy Council

controversy in this appeal relates to the validity of an enactment of the legislature of the Province of British Columbia imposing a tax on timber cut within the Province. The tax was originally imposed in 1903 in substantially … year, and was subsequently re-enacted with unimportant alterations until in S.58, Forest Act, being Chap. 93, Statutes of British Columbia, 1924, it assumed the form in which its legality is now for the first time challenged. The section

Attorney-general of British Columbia V. Attorney-general of Canada and ...

Court: Privy Council

Reported in: AIR1937PC91

Matched in: Parties Attorney-general of British Columbia V. Attorney-general of Canada and Others