Breach - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: breach Page 1 of about 8 results (0.016 seconds)Breach Candy Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai Vs. Babulal B. Parde ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [2001(91)FLR1185]; 2002(2)MhLj227
has concluded that the enquiry did not suffer from a breach of the principles of natural justice and the findings of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust and Others Vs. Dipesh Mehta and O ...
Court: Mumbai
a civil right; and if such right is invaded or breached, they have a cause of action to sue for a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBreach Candy Hospital and Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC123
are installed in such establishment, and in the event of breach of any of the terms of the undertaking aforesaid, he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBreach Candy Hospital and Research Centre Vs. Babulal B. Pardeshi
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1998(79)FLR533]; (1998)IILLJ515Bom
petition, the following order shall remain operative.(i) The petitioner employer Breach Candy Hospital Research Centre shall pay to the workman Respondent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBreach Candy Swimming Bath Trust Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC42
1. Heard both sides. The issue involved is whether the appellants are liable to pay service tax as "Mandap Keepers"...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBreach Candy Hospital Trust Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and o ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (2010)228CTR(Bom)381
D.G. Karnik, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dt. 31st March, 2009 passed by the Chief...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Vs. Breach Candy Swimming Bath ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1955Bom250; (1955)57BOMLR84; ILR1955Bom268
maintenance and construction of a salt water swimming bath at Breach Candy. The provision with regard to the supplying of refreshments
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollusion Between Respondents No.1 and 2 (iii) there Is a Fundamental ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
between respondents No.1 & 2, (iii) there is a fundamental breach PUSHPINDER SAINI201408.07 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>