Bradwell V Illinois - Judgment Search Results

Vasantha R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)IILLJ843Mad

who hadacquired a law qualification to practice law, hadbeen denied of licence which was thesubject-matter of challenge in Bradwell v.Illinois reported in (1873) 16 Wall 141. TheUnited State Supreme Court while holding thatthe denial of licence solely

Sir Iqbal Ahmad, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court Vs. the Hon'ble the Ch ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1962All391

38 Law Ed 929 at p. 930, Ex parte, A. H. Garland, (1866) 18 Law Ed 366 and Bradwell v. Illinois, (1873) 21 Law Ed 442). However, in my opinion, there is mo good ground to apply the American

S. Ananthakrishnan Vs. the State of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1952Mad395; (1952)1MLJ208

or the other taxes with which these cases were concerned.17. Learned counsel for the petitioner cited to us 'Bradwell v. Illinois', (1873) 83 U S 644: 21 Law Ed. 442. In that case the Supreme Court of Illinois refused

A.N. Rangaswamy and anr. Vs. the Industrial Tribunal, Fort. St. George ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1954Mad553

as such by its order upon evidence of their possessing sufficient legal learning and fair private character."In -- 'Bradwell v. Illinois', (1876) 21 Law Eel 442 (B), dealing with the right of a woman to be admitted to the

Liberator Press and Rangaswami Vs. State of Madras and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1954)ILLJ301Mad

admitted as such by its order upon evidence of their possessing sufficient legal learning and fair private character.In Bradwell v. Illinois 21 L. Ed. 442 dealing with the right of a woman to be admitted to the bar, Bradley, … act on behalf of suitors in a court is not a right flowing from citizenship. The reasoning in Bradwell v. Illinois 21 L. Ed.442 is to this extent not bad law even to this day. The exclusive right to

Dothard Vs. Rawlinson

Court: US Supreme Court

those energies and responsibilities, and that decision and firmness which are presumed to predominate in the sterner sex." Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130, 83 U. S. 139 , 83 U. S. 142 (1873) (Bradley, J., concurring). [ Footnote

Mississippi Univ. for Women Vs. Hogan

Court: US Supreme Court

Fourteenth Amendment prohibited a State from classifying her as unfit to practice law simply because she was female. Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130 (1873). In his opinion concurring in the judgment, Justice Bradley described the reasons underlying the

Cleburne Vs. Cleburne Living Ctr.

Court: US Supreme Court

(1927) (Holmes, J.); cf. 163 U. S. Ferguson, Page 473 U. S. 464 163 U. S. 537 (1896); Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130, 83 U. S. 141 (1873) (Bradley, J., concurring in judgment). Prejudice, once let loose, is … and invidious constraint on human potential and freedom. Compare Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 (1896), and Bradwell v. Illinois, supra, at 83 U. S. 141 (Bradley, J., concurring in judgment), with Brown v. Board of Education, 347

California Fed. S and L Vs. Guerra

Court: US Supreme Court

the workplace. See, e.g., Muller v. Oregon, 208 U. S. 412 , 208 U. S. 421 -423 (1908); Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130, 83 U. S. 141 (1873) (Bradley, J., concurring). It is not the place of this

Colgate Vs. Harvey

Court: US Supreme Court

immunities of all citizens shall be absolutely unabridged, unimpaired." The same distinction is made by this Court in Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130, 83 U. S. 138 , where, speaking of the privileges and immunities provision of the … credits. Vermont-Commission on Taxation-Report 1908, pp. 43 ff. [ Footnote 2/2 ] Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36; Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130; Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 18 Wall. 129; Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162; Walker v. Sauvinet,