Both - Judgment Search Results

Narendra Mafatlal Mehta, Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)BomCR302

..... 1 of am 91policy is significant because it clearly postulatesthat both the aforesaid conditions are not requiredto be fulfilled for ..... theapplication of the petitioners 6 having heard the counsel on both sides andhaving perused the records placed before us we areof ..... 1 of am 91policy is significant because it clearly postulatesthat both the aforesaid conditions are not requiredto be fulfilled for .....

Minor S. Vijayakumar (Died), Vs. R. Subbarayan, S/O C.M. Ramasamy Goun ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)3MLJ43

..... the income from the joint family properties was not sufficient to meet both ends is untrue 3 it is not necessary to notice the ..... lands the meagre income from the properties were not sufficient to meet both ends with the result debts were incurred for family and cultivation ..... at the time the original of ex a 11 came into existence both the plaintiffs had not been born the first defendant also had .....

Dr. Dina Sohrab Hakim and Dr. Avimoy Sohrab Hakim, Indian Inhabitants ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2002Bom387; 2002(6)BomCR277; (2002)3BOMLR646; 2002(2)MhLj851

r m lodha j 1 heard mrs m v shetty learned counsel forpetitioners and ms savla learned counsel forrespondent no...

Bentex Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)LC378Tri(Delhi)

..... 1998 no suppression of facts can be said to have been made by both the companies as they both got themselves independently registered with the excise department by disclosing their constitution ..... and without verifying their constitution the department was obviously aware about the true functioning of both these companies therefore extended period of limitation could not be invoked 12 the imposition .....

Zelman Vs. Simmons-harris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... hospitals jan 2002 http www mergerwatch org inthenews publicfunding html moreover taking into account both medicare and medicaid religious hospitals received nearly 45 billion from the federal fisc ..... than state property tax exemptions for religious institutions or tax deductions for charitable contributions both of which come far closer to exemplifying the neutrality that distinguishes for example .....

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madhavsang Nathuji Darbar and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2003ACJ1307; (2003)1GLR517

..... admit notice of admission is waived by learned advocates appearing for the respective respondents 3 both these appeals are filed by the appellant insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated ..... cases the tribunal has applied the same reasoning while granting the compensation in both the cases because both the deceased persons were aged about 24 and 25 years almost similar notional .....

Gopala Polyplast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT121Tri(Mum.)bai

..... we proceed to decide the appeal itself with the consent of both sides 2 the appellants herein manufactured hdpe strips tapes falling ..... final products on which no duty was payable 3 on hearing both sides and noting the admitted position that some quantity of ..... injection moulding machines used for manufacture of plastic crates which were both goods dutiable as well as exempt under notification no 15 94 .....

Gujarat Glass Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT822Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and split air conditioner the learned chartered accountant for the appellants states that both the items are eligible for modvat credit under the entry at sr no ..... cnc cooling panel and air conditioner are not eligible for modvat credit as both are classified under heading 84 15 and are specifically excluded he also states ..... 1 heard both sides under the impugned order modvat credit initially allowed by .....

Cosboard Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2002)LC286Tri(Kol.)kata

..... h this concession should be applied jointly for the clearances of both the factories because 1 the facility of using the boiler earmarked ..... a particular plant by the other plant is sufficient for treating both plants as part of the same factory 7 the two ..... being 3500 mt i they have adopted the concessional clearances for both the factories separately j thus they are unlawfully availing the benefit .....

Siddarth Agarwal, Shri Atul Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT195TriDel

..... directors m s repl engaged in the manufacture of electronic transformers both the units manufacture their goods under a common brand name ..... is contended that there was no suppression of facts inasmuch as both the manufacturers had filed declaration before the central excise authorities that ..... of another person is not used it is also stressed that both the units are located in the same building in the .....