Both - Judgment Search Results
Both Residing at New j Type 28/16, Rang Hills Pune 411 020. Vs. the St ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-2010
.:1. By this appeal, the appellants have challenged their conviction under section 323 of Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) and sentence recorded by learned Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995 whereby learned...
Both R/O Sangvi (Bk), Tq. Yaval, District Jalgaon Vs. Maharashtra Reve ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Dec-15-2010
Both R/O Sangvi (Bk), Tq. Yaval, District Jalgaon Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal
Both Resident of 611, Kasewadi Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER A.R.JOSHI,J.) : 1. Heard rival arguments at length on this Appeal preferred by the Appellants/original accused Nos.1 & 2. Both the appellants were convicted in Sessions Case No.489 of 2002 vide order dated...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Both of Bombay, Indian Inhabitants, Partners. Vs. the Trustees of F.E. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per P.B. Majmudar, J.) 1. Both these petitions are directed against the order of the Charity Commissioner dated 27th April, 1994 passed under Section 36 (2) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (hereinafter...
Both Ro Sawara Manchanpur Vs. Dnyaneshwar Shalikram Bhore
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-05-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. By this application, the applicants prayed for to quash and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Criminal Revision Application No.45/ 2006 and...
Both Residents of Village Simla Gujran, Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
CRA No.2088-SB OF 200.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.2088-SB OF 200.DECIDED ON:- 20.12.2012.”1. Rohtash son of Phool Dass, 2. Naazim son of Alladeen, both residents of village Simla Gujran,...
“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
Crl. Misc. not M-30341 of 2012 (O&M) -:1. :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. not M-30341 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: August 20, 2013. Jagmeet...
“5. Both these Contentions Are in My View Not Tenable. the Vs. Finan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
LPA No.762 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.762 of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision:17.07.2013 Parminder Kaur & another .....Appellants Versus Financial Commissioner & others ......Respondents...
Both Are the Residents Village Mohanbari,district Jhajjar. Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
Criminal Appeal No.516-DB o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.516-DB of 2007 Date of decision: April 29”1. Surajmal son of Jiwan 2. Joginder son of Jiwan both are the...
“after Hearing Both the Counsel for the Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision 636 of 2012 Date of Decision : December 05, 2012 Sham Lal ....Petitioner Versus Raj Kumar .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present :...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free