Both - Judgment Search Results
Both Residing at New j Type 28/16, Rang Hills Pune 411 020. Vs. the St ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-2010
.:1. By this appeal, the appellants have challenged their conviction under section 323 of Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) and sentence...
Both R/O Sangvi (Bk), Tq. Yaval, District Jalgaon Vs. Maharashtra Reve ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Dec-15-2010
1 Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 2 The brief facts of the case, as disclosed in the petition, are...
Both Resident of 611, Kasewadi Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-03-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER A.R.JOSHI,J.) : 1. Heard rival arguments at length on this Appeal preferred by the Appellants/original accused Nos.1...
Both of Bombay, Indian Inhabitants, Partners. Vs. the Trustees of F.E. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per P.B. Majmudar, J.) 1. Both these petitions are directed against the order of the Charity Commissioner dated...
Both Ro Sawara Manchanpur Vs. Dnyaneshwar Shalikram Bhore
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-05-2011
ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. By this application, the applicants prayed for to quash and set aside the judgment and order...
Both Residents of Village Simla Gujran, Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
CRA No.2088-SB OF 200.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.2088-SB OF 200.DECIDED ON:- 20.12.2012.”1....
“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
Crl. Misc. not M-30341 of 2012 (O&M) -:1. :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA...
“5. Both these Contentions Are in My View Not Tenable. the Vs. Finan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
LPA No.762 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.762 of 2013 (O...
Both Are the Residents Village Mohanbari,district Jhajjar. Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
Criminal Appeal No.516-DB o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.516-DB of 2007 Date...
“after Hearing Both the Counsel for the Vs. Raj Kumar
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision 636 of 2012 Date of Decision : December...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »