Skip to content


Both - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: both Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 306 results (0.253 seconds)
Sep 04 1998 (TRI)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-04-1998

Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC591

..... arose under the provisions of punjab municipal act and another under delhi municipal corporation act both being governed by rent control statutes which contemplated fixation of standard rent in accordance ..... those eps and enforced them according to learned counsel the premise and conclusion are both erroneous we find on verification that there are more discrepancies than consistencies between a86 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 1998 (FN)

Clinton Vs. City of New York

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-27-1998

..... the framers designed but truncated versions of two bills that passed both houses pp 436 441 b the court rejects two related government ..... inability to obtain the benefit id at 666 having found that both the new york and snake river appellees are actually injured ..... cancellation powers however are truncated versions of two bills that passed both houses of congress they are not the product of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1998 (HC)

Ganesh Vs. Syed Munned Ahamed and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-18-1998

Reported in: 2000ACJ1463

..... entire compensation from one or the other and decisions in which both proportion of negligence as also apportionment of liability is made ..... an accident is a result of composite negligence of drivers of both the vehicles and in such circumstances the claimant can proceed ..... appearing for the appellant submitted that since the tribunal held that both the drivers of the auto and car were responsible for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 1998 (TRI)

Leeladhar Biyani and Sons Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer,

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-15-1998

Reported in: (2001)124STC294Tribunal

..... arise in the facts and circumstances to be stated as hereunder 2 since both these applications involve the common questions of law and fact they are being ..... and interest has been deleted what remains is the amount of penalty in both the applications 7 shri sharma contends before us that once regular final assessment ..... 1 both these applications filed under section 8 1 of the rajasthan taxation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1998 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Khamb11atta Family Trust

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Feb-10-1998

Reported in: (1998)62TTJ(Ahd.)675

..... in asst yr 1986 87 since the facts and the reasonings of both the parties are identical to those discussed by us in our ..... toto whether it was distribution of corpus or income 13 after hearing both the sides we are of the considered opinion that the learned cit ..... as expenses of the industrial undertaking instead of showing gross amount on both the sides if the assessee trust would have shown the net .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1998 (TRI)

Shree Gopal Gupta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-21-1998

..... the course of search and seizure operations the facts as explained on both sides are that during the course of searches stock of yarn ..... assessee this was taken note of and recorded in annexure b both the cloth as well as the yarn was mentioned against the ..... from the concerned orders of the revenue authorities and as explained on both sides are that during the course of searches the assessee stated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1998 (TRI)

Tata Yodogwa Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Decided on: Jan-08-1998

Reported in: (1998)67ITD174(Pat.)

..... of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of both the parties as discussed above we also hold that it was not ..... record either on fact or in law the facts and the law both had been considered in the original assessment it cannot be said that ..... the assessing officer under section 154 was not authorised by law therefore both on the merits and the includibility of the 3 above items in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 1998 (TRI)

Himani Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Decided on: Sep-02-1998

Reported in: (2000)118STC193Tribunal

..... a homeopathic medicine nor an ayurvedic drug it is claimed to be a medicine under both the systems similarly respondent no 1 s observation is criticised that homeopathic medicine can ..... long clinical experience as recorded in authoritative homeopathic literature of india and abroad and namely both the conditions must be fulfilled which is prepared according to the techniques of homeopathic pharmacy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1998 (TRI)

Steel Authority of India and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-23-1998

Reported in: (2000)118STC260Tribunal

..... in an unenviable position their one and only contention is that both the notifications dated march 17 1986 and february 22 1988 ..... a perusal of the same suggests that the government denies exemption both on the ground that some of the manufacturers have factories outside ..... the benefit of exemption or concession the sail are effecting sales both to re rolling mills as well as to tube manufacturers they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 1998 (TRI)

Bhatter'S Bhatter And Company Vs. I.C.T./Bureau Of Investigation

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Decided on: Jul-15-1998

Reported in: (2000)120STC470Tribunal

..... 3 till october 30 1997 respondent no 3 accorded sanction in both the cases for retention of the seized records made on november ..... 1997 16 mr chakraborty learned advocate for the applicants has argued in both the cases that affidavits affirmed by mr a r mia assistant ..... taxes bureau of investigation who was the respondent no 2 in both the cases cannot be taken into consideration as the same was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //