Borough - Judgment Search Results
Padmakant Motilal Vora Vs. the Ahmedabad Municipal Borough
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-19-1942
Reported in: AIR1943Bom9; (1942)44BOMLR814
procedure in regard to his dismissal was improper and unfair. Under Section 58 (f) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act there is provision for making rules delegating to the officers designated in the rules the power to
Godhara Borough Municipality Vs. Godhara Electricity Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1504; [1969]39CompCas395(SC); [1969]73ITR44(SC); [1968]3SCR481
of Panchmahals. 2. The matter arises out of assessments made by the appellant constituted under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 on the respondent under section 73 of the Act. The respondents are an electricity company owning
Bhusawal Borough Municipality Vs. Amalgamated Electricity Co. Ltd. and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-10-1963
Reported in: AIR1966SC1652; [1964]5SCR905
second appeal disposing of two appeals which arise out of two separate suits instituted by the appellant, the Borough Municipality of Bhusawal, against the Bhusawal Electricity Co. Ltd., respondent No. 1 before us, to which suits the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Baroda Borough Municipality Vs. Its Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-13-1956
Reported in: AIR1957SC110; (1957)59BOMLR235; (1957)ILLJ8SC; [1957]1SCR33
special leave from a decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal at Bombay, dated November 23, 1955. The Baroda Borough Municipality is the appellant, and the respondents are the workmen employed in the electricity department of the said
Municipal Borough of Talod Vs. Manubhai Khodidas Rajgor and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-04-2004
Reported in: [2004(102)FLR56]
Matched in: Parties Municipal Borough of Talod Vs. Manubhai Khodidas Rajgor and anr.
idar Municipal Borough Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-19-1997
Reported in: (1998)1GLR722
February 21, 1997. By the impugned judgment, the learned single Judge dismissed the petition filed by Idar Municipal Borough; formerly Idar Nagar Panchayat [Appellant herein].4. Few relevant facts to appreciate the controversy raised in this appeal may
Municipal Borough of Belgaum Vs. Durga Prasad Company
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-29-1984
Reported in: ILR1985KAR1004
at Karve shop he used to convey them to Belgaum Railway Station to export outside the Belgaum Municipal Borough. To do so, he had to convey the betelnuts by passing Vengurla Toll Naka which would be the
The Jalgaon Borough Municipality Vs. the Khandesh Spinning and Weaving ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-06-1961
Reported in: (1962)64BOMLR229
space. This rule received the sanction of the Government as required under the provisions of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act on November 25, 1947, and became effective from April 1, 1948. In pursuance of this rule the
The Borough Municipality of Karad Vs. the Collector of North Satara
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-1957
Reported in: (1957)59BOMLR1133
227 of the Constitution and it arises under the following circumstances.2. The applicant in this case is the Borough Municipality of Karad. The Borough Municipality appears to have made certain encroachments upon a street land. In consequence
Municipal Borough, Bijapur Vs. Gundawan (M.N.) and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-26-1965
Reported in: (1965)IILLJ26Kant
material for our present purpose are these. The respondents are borne on the staff of the Bijapur Municipal Borough. They work in the octroi department of that borough. They claimed overtime allowance under the provisions of the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free