Border Security Force Act 1968 Section 47 - Judgment Search Results

Yacub Kispotta and Others Vs. Director General BSF and Others

Court: Delhi

Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 14 (c),Section 2I-C, Section 22, Section 23, Section 36, Section 40, Section 47, Section 48, Section 49, Section 51, Section 64, Section 70, Section 74, Section 170, Section 171, Section 173, … any inquiry or giving them opportunity to explain their alleged misconduct in accordance with its parent law, the Border Security Force Act, 1968 ("the Act") or the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 ( Rules ?) framed there-under. 2. The facts necessary

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … offence while on active duty and the case squarely falls within 1st exception to the general provisions of Section 47 of the BSF Act, for which option is available to the applicant either to try them at BSF

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

about the said design to his superior officer. Proceedings before General Security Force Court were held under the Border Security Force Act,1968. After affording full opportunity to the petitioner, the proceeding of conviction was submitted. Authority sentenced the petitioner to … his contention Section 46 of the B.S.F.Act is reproduced as under 46.Civil Offences Subject to the provisions of Section 47, any person subject to this Act who at any place in, or beyond India, commits any civil offence,

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B. S. F., Bikaner (non-petitioner No. 2) and directed … Section 46 of the Act deals with Civil Offences. It lays down that subject to the provisions of Section 47, an person subject to B. S. F. Act, who at any place in, or beyond, India, commits any

Siya Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

proceeding of the Summary Security Force Court held against the petitioner under Section 46 and 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (the Act for short) and the penalty/sentence contained in the order dated 10.8.2001 of reduction in rank to … Act is not reproduced as It is irrelevant for our discussion. Except for the situations contemplated in Sections 47, 52 and 80 of the Act read with Rules 41 and 42 of the Border Security Force Rules,

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 … clear that 'summary security force court' of the B.S.F. Act has got jurisdiction to try civil offences, i.e., Section 47 of the B.S.F. Act read with Sections 7 and 12 of the P. C. Act. Accordingly, I have

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … dated 2. 2. 1999. The relevant part of the order of the Court reads as under:'By virtue of Section 47 the offence of rape committed by a person subject to BSF Act against a person who is not

State of J and K Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … offence while on active duty and the case squarely falls within 1st exception to the general provisions of Section 47 of the BSF Act, for which option is available to the applicant either to try them at BSF

Atal Bihari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

(„SSFC‟ hereafter) whereby the petitioner was found guilty of commission of offence punishable under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the sentence awarding dismissal from service. WP(C) No.5622/2013 page 1 o”2. The petitioner was recruited as Constable … has urged that the SSFC had no jurisdiction to conduct the trial of the petitioner in view of Section 47 of the BSF Act. A reading of the said statute would show that the SSFC is prohibited only