Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: jharkhand Page 6 of about 227 results (0.083 seconds)

Sep 20 2017 (HC)

Asif Eqbal Alias Asif Ansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... is stated that when officer in charge of kanke police station got an information regarding communal violence between members of two communities at village sukurhutu, he alongwith the police force arrived there. they tried to pacify members of both the communities who were armed variously with dangerous weapons, however, they were aggressively trying to hurt each other. ..... order dated 24.08.2017 records that accused petitioners in this batch of bail applications have raised almost identical grounds for bail. it is contended that no specific overt act has been attributed to any of the petitioners. they have denied being part of the mob which allegedly was involved in the occurrence. moreover, the person who caused ..... for offences under sections 147/148/149/152/153/332/333/337/338/307/ 353/ 427 ipc, section 3 of prevention of damage to public property act and section 27 of arms act. the petitioner in b.a. no. 5611 of 2017 claims that he is a student of b.com in marwari college, ranchi and he has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2017 (HC)

Ms Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited Through Its Authorized ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... base price of the grade of coal to be supplied to the petitioner. they were in the nature of advance bank guarantees for securing respondent- c.c.l in respect of value/ price of coal to be supplied to the petitioner. the conditions of the bank ..... valid up to 20.11.2015. pursuant to the aforesaid f.s.a., petitioner deposited 4 bank guarantees (annexure-1 series) as security deposit in terms of the relevant conditions of the f.s.a. which are as follows:- sl.no. bank guarantee no. bank guarantee ..... has also made declaration in terms of 19 section 39(4) and 42(9) of the companies act, 2013 and rule 12 and 14 of the company (prospectus and allotment of security) rule, 2014, which shows the date of allotment of shares as 22.06.2016 in form no ..... shareholding to the financial institution in terms of section 39(4) and 42(9) of the companies act, 2013 and rule 12 and 14 of the companies (prospectus and allotment of security) rule, 2014, which shows the date of allotment of share as 22.6.2016 in form no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2015 (HC)

Ranchi Power Distribution Company Limited and Anr Vs. Jharkhand Bijli ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... ble supreme court went on to hold that in spite of repeated pronouncements, the high courts continued to ignore the availability of statutory remedies under the drt act and the sarfaesi act and exercising jurisdiction under article 227 of the constitution of india. the fact situation of the case at hand with respect to alternative remedy in view of ..... to be enforceable against the company, its agents or any person who was a surety thereto or had guaranteed the performance thereof and shall be of as full force and effect, against or in favour of the state of west bengal and shall be enforceable as fully and effectively as if instead of the company the ..... termination 16.1 distribution franchisee event of default the occurrence and continuation of any of the following events, unless any such event occurs as a result of a force majeure event or a breach by jseb of its obligations under this agreement shall constitute a distribution franchisee event of default. 16.1.1 critical event of default .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2017 (HC)

Mr Azaz Khan Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... amount ctl +cc as such the account was declared as n.p.a on 02.11.2013. thereafter bank initiated proceedings under sarfaesi act, 2002 and moved an application under section 14(1) of the sarfaesi act befrore the deputy commissioner, east singhbhum, jamshedpur for physical possession of the mortgaged property. thereafter the deputy comissioner got an enquiry conducted ..... 2017 and subsequently enhanced upt rs. 80,34,7000/ on dated 28.12.2012. mohd azas khan (guarantor) offered the bank to mortgage his land as collateral security details of which has been given in the written report. it is further alleged that mohd sahid khan, who is brother and priprieotr of another firm m/s ..... the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that this petitioner is an advocate in civil court, jamshedpur and he has given false legal opinion regarding c.n.t. act on the basis which loan was sanctioned. a.b. a. no. 1665 of 2017 learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner mr. rajendra kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Vikash Kumar Gupta Vs. Revenue Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Smt Usha Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Dilip Kumar Sinha Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Rajrajeshwar Prasad Singh Chandel Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through t ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Sabita Singh and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2015 (HC)

Akil Ahmad Vs. Land Reforms and Revenue Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... section 23 of the bihar tenants holdings (maintenance of records) act, 1973. in certain cases registering officer can make appropriate endorsement on the document, if the registering officer has refused to register a document. in ..... properly stamped and complete in all respects or not.13. the registering authority can refuse registration, if he is satisfied that requirements under the registration act are not satisfied. the registering officer can also refuse registration if the document presented for registration is not accompanied with khata pustika as provided under ..... belong to the person who claims to have sold the same for valuable consideration, the registering officer would be failing in discharging his duty under the act if he registers the same. similarly, if by government notification/circular/order, description of certain government properties, forest land etc., have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //