Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: jharkhand Page 3 of about 227 results (0.199 seconds)

Simplex Infrastructures Limite Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Excel Venture Construction Co. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Modi Projects Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Niraj Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Nav Nirman Builders Through Its Managing Partner Vs. State of Jharkhan ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Nav Nirman Builders Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....

Manohar Lal JaIn Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR362(Jhr)]

..... the basis of possession and the high court will not interfere with findings of fact arrived at by the mutation authorities. he further submits that the said act came into force with effect from 2.10.1990 and the instant proceeding was initiated on the basis of an application filed on 19.1.1996 when admittedly, section 17 ..... of 1975), the governor of bihar was pleased to appoint 2nd day of october, 1990 as the date on which the said act will be deemed to have come into force in respect of all the remaining districts/anchals which had not been notified previously. it is true that the proceedings was initiated thereafter, i.e. on 19 ..... paragraph 4 therein that 'had the proceedings been initiated after coming into force of the act, then his view was right, but as stated above, as the proceeding was initiated prior to corning into force of the act, the revision was maintainable'. in the instant case, the aforementioned act came into effect from 2.10.1990 and the proceedings was initiated .....

Singh Saw Mill Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR509(Jhr)]

..... 26.6.1996, an order was passed confirming the confiscation of twenty one logs of timber referred to above as also the cancellation of licence and forfeiture of security money. however, the saw machine was ordered to be released on the ground that the forest officers had not mentioned the same in the seizure list.10 ..... semal which were brought there without any transit permit. therefore, according to the respondents, the petitioner had violated section 41 and 42 of the indian forest act, 1927 (bihar amendment act, 1989). consequently, these logs were seized and confiscation case no. 03/1995 had been initiated and on 18.10.1995, an order of confiscation ..... of the twenty one logs together with the saw mill as also cancellation of licence fee and security money was passed. against the aforementioned order, the petitioner appeared .....

Tata MaIn Hospital Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR174(Jhr)]

..... system in which payment of valuable consideration is made by instalments, shall, notwithstanding the fact that the seller retains that title in the goods as a security for the payment of the valuable consideration or for any other reasons, be deemed to be a sale or purchase.explanation-ii- notwithstanding anything contained in ..... any law for the time being in force, two independent purchases or sales shall, for the purpose of this part, be deemed to have taken place-(a) when the goods are transferred from principal ..... assistant commissioner, commercial taxes, urban circle, jamshedpur passed an order for assessment of the sales tax against the petitioner under section 17 (5) of the bihar finance act, 1981 for the last four financial years. (vi) to quash the demand notices dated 20th march 2006, contained in annexure-14 series, issued by the assistant commissioner .....

Shivam Coke Industries and Rani Sati Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. St ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR267(Jhr)]; (2008)18VST289(Jharkh)

..... which was collected by the department from the market as well as from the agricultural marketing board, assam. the sale price depends on the market force and in the absence of any valid piece of evidence like sale receipts of the commodity indicating the price or any other acceptable evidence, the said ..... calcutta high court, placed before us by the respondent have no relevance.our attention has been invited to section 34 of the maharashtra agriculture income tax act, 1962 where when defining the revisional power of the commissioner the legislature has expressly incorporated a provision prohibiting the commissioner from exercising his revisional power ..... 87 prescribes limitation of five years after expiry of which, the commissioner cannot exercise that power.38. similarly, section 33 of the tamil nadu general sales act, 1959 confers power of revision upon the deputy commissioner. section 34 prescribes special power of joint commissioner of commercial taxes. according to this section, the .....