Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Sorted by: old Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 227 results (0.151 seconds)

Harendra Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR668(Jhr)]

..... general security force court. thus, as the confirmation is not required of the court order under section 114, obvious it ..... commandant is somewhat arbitrary and illegal. consequently, it is found that against the summary security force court order (hereinafter referred to as the court order), there is no appeal because under section 114, the order of the summary security force court do not require confirmation, whereas under section 117 of the border security force act, 1968. the appeal lies to the confirming authority against the order of a .....

Suresh Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR422(Jhr)]

..... and 5th november, 2003, sent on his leave address but neither he reported for duty nor sent any information/reply to the said letters. as per section 62 of the border security force act, 1968, court of inquiry was ordered vide officer order no. 13271-76 dated 27.12.2003 and apprehension roll was also issued to the superintendent of police, gopalganj. a show ..... .4. petitioner's case is that he overstayed the leave of two month, by six months as he was suffering from lumbo sciatica syndrome. relying on rule 22 of the border security force rules, 1969, it is submitted that departmental proceeding should have been initiated against him before passing the impugned order of dismissal. he relied on the judgment of this court in .....

Daroga Yadav Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR277]; [2006(2)JCR353(Jhr)]

..... of powers conferred by proviso to section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995. by the said notification, the central government has exempted all categories of posts of 'combatant personnel' of central para-military force; central reserve police force; central industrial security force; indo-tibetian border police; border security force; and assam rifles. it was submitted that all categories of ..... posts of 'combatant personnel1 having been exempted from the rigor of section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995, it was open to the respondents to ..... s.j. mukhopadhaya, j.1. the petitioner was in the services of the border security force (hereinafter referred to as the b.s.f.). in the extremist attack in jammu & kashmir state, he sustained bullet injuries resulting .....

Daulti Devi, Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1956; 2007CriLJ3563

..... sadhana @ pinki aged about 22 years was married to the appellant anil singh of village maktama in the year 1991. appellant anil singh was a constable in the border security force and after some time of the marriage he started putting pressure upon sadhana @ pinki to bring a motorcycle as well as colour t.v. as the dowry. ..... but the ingredients required for the offence under section 304b as against the appellants is proved in view of the presumption under section 113b of the indian evidence act.36. therefore, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against the appellants are well discussed by the learned 3rd additional sessions judge, hazaribagh in ..... in secrecy, independent and direct evidence is not easy to get. that is why the legislature has by introducing section 113a and 113b in the evidence act tried to strengthen the prosecution hands by permitting a presumption to be raised if certain foundational facts are established and the unfortunate event has taken place within .....

The Union of India and Others Vs. Ram Chander Pandey

Court : Jharkhand

..... holding that the respondent ought to have been given alternative employment. the learned assistant solicitor general of india further submitted that the border security force has been exempted from the applicability of the disabilities act, 1995 for which notification dated 10.09.2002 was issued however, it was not kept in view by the writ court ..... protection under section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995 and this question was answered in favour of the respondentsb.s.f. in the ..... and it is thus, submitted that since the border security force is exempted from the purview of section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995, the respondent cannot claim .....

Abhilasha and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... husband of petitioner no. 1 while working as assistant 2 sub-inspector (clerk), a proceeding in terms of 20(a) of the border security force act. 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act for the sake of brevity) was initiated against the petitioner on the basis of complaint made by one sri navin chandra, head clerk ..... had taken place. it has further been submitted that vide letter dated 22.08.2005, a proceeding under rule 63 (4) (6) of the border security force rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the rule for the sake of brevity) was initiated, which culminated in passing of impugned order of dismissal dated ..... nagar, haryana-135003. ... petitioners versus 1.union of india. 2.the director general, border security force, c.g.o complex, lodi road, new delhi. 3.the deputy inspector general, boarder security force, meru, hazaribagh. 4.the commandant, s.t.s wing, p.c. & s boarder boarder security force, meru, hazaribagh. . . respondents ------ coram: hon ble mr. justice pramath patnaik ------ .....

Christopher Kujur Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... but a school i.e. temple of learning. even a similar act of this nature would have serious implication. in the case of ramvir singh versus union of india reported in (2009) 3 scc97the appellant in that case was working as a constable in the border security force. penalty of removal from service was imposed upon him on account of ..... its position in chandra kumar chopra versus union of india & ors. reported in (2012) 6 scc369wherein it has been held that primary obligation of a member of armed forces is to maintain discipline in all aspects. it has been held that the doctrine of proportionality is uninvocable. in case of s.r.tewari versus union of india & ..... he was held guilty by the enquiry officer and was awarded punishment pursuant to the practice followed in the force just to keep the force disciplined and to deter the members of the force for not indulging in such type of act.6. considering the above submissions of the parties as well as materials brought on record, it appears that .....

Sunil Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... tc&s bsf, hazaribagh, jharkhand (annexure 1), consequent upon the summary security force court convicted the petitioner for the offence under section 40 of the border security force act, 1968 for an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force and sentenced him to be dismissed from service. the petitioner has been struck ..... - bhojpur (bihar) ... petitioner versus 1. the union of india 2. ministry of home affairs, inspector general, border security force, block no. 10, lodi road, new delhi 3. the commandant, special training school, training centre & school, border security force, hazaribagh 4. d.i.g.-cum- commandant, b.s.f., meru, hazaribagh ...... respondents for the petitioner : ..... submitted that this writ application has been filed suppressing material fact that the petitioner has submitted statutory petition against his conviction by summary security force court and the same was duly considered and rejected by the director general of bsf vide his dated 31st july, 2008 and the .....

Vinod Kumar Vs. Union of India Through the Home Secretary Department o ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... year 2006 the rules for technical cadre came into existence which is known as border security force motor transport workshop (non gazetted) group c posts recruitment rules, 2006 (for short hereinafter referred to as the rules, 2006 ) enacted under the border security force act, 1968. as per this rule cut off date was 21st september, 2006. ..... dated 9th january, 2001 (annexure 2 to the memo of this letters patent appeal) he was appointed as a constable in border security force. there are varieties of constables in the border security force for which the qualifications are also different, but, the facts remains that appointment on a technical post is altogether different. it ..... mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) this appellant is original petitioner who applied for the post of constable (general duty) in the border security force in pursuance of the public advertisement dated 2 nd october, 2000 as he was certificate holder of industrial training institute (iti). he was also doing .....

Lalmani Mahato Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : I(2003)DMC462

..... is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand does not at all stands ..... witness has not found any external or internal injury on the dead body of the deceased. the medical witness has further deposed that no force was used in administering poison to the deceased. p.w. 1 has deposed that the appellant was on his duty at the relevant ..... case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband. section 113-b of the evidence act provides that when the question is whether a person has committed the dowry death of a woman and it is shown that soon ..... was not found guilty for the offence under sections 302, 328 of i.p.c. and under sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act.6. now the question for determination in this case is as to whether there is any illegality in the impugned judgment and order requiring .....