Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: jharkhand Page 9 of about 227 results (0.080 seconds)

Golo Mandla Ram Rao and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1738

..... been seen near rajasthan hotel at lalpur chowk in the town of ranchi and he is possessed of counterfeit currency notes in huge quantity and the informant with the police force, went there and the said appellant was apprehended near rajasthan hotel aforesaid and on query he disclosed his name and, counterfeit currency notes of rs. 100/- denomination ..... of the word 'counterfeit' that counterfeit is a process by which one thing is caused to resemble another thing. it supposes that there is an original. the act of counterfeiting is the effect of producing another so as to resemble the original and the object of which is to practise deception on knowing it to be likely ..... agreement between the appellants who are alleged to conspire and the said agreement should be for doing an illegal act or for doing by illegal means an act which may not itself be illegal and there must be some overt act done by one of them in pursuance of the said agreement, the prosecution has not led any evidence on .....

Md. Zakaria and ors. Vs. Md. Aslam and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR620(Jhr)]

..... operate as estoppel against plaintiffs' contrary claim in the present suit that mostt. mahtabo was a benamidar?2. whether the suit was barred under article 59 of the limitation act, 1963 ?15. it is not in dispute that plaintiffs' father ibrahim had accepted mostt. mahtabo to be real owner of the property in question in title suit no. ..... in the revenue records of the state. according to the contesting defendants for the purpose of counting limitation for filing the present suit, article 59 of the limitation act, 1963 was applicable and as such the suit having been filed after more than 3 years from the date of knowledge, in the year 1970, was clearly barred ..... real owners of the properties held by others benami. such an act was not given any retrospective effect by the legislature. section 4(1) of the act was not retrospective in operation and was not applicable to pending suits already filed and entertained prior to coming into force of section 4, which provided that only from the date of .....

Purushottam Das Ajmera Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR98b(Jhr)]

..... a mines but if it is in or adjacent to a mines, it will come within the definition of mine and consequently it will vest under section 4 of the act. the plaintiff has not at all pleaded that the land in question had not vested. in fact it was not a title suit rather an eviction suit. the question ..... 3 was also decided against the plaintiff and it was held that the suit premises vested in defendant no. 1 bccl under the provision of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 consequently other issued were accordingly disposed of and the suit was dismissed.7. the point for determination in this appeal is whether the suit land vested in defendant-respondent ..... plaintiff is entitled to recover arrear of rent as claimed?3. whether the suit premises vested in defendant no. 1 under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972?4. to what relief or reliefs if any is the plaintiff entitled?the issue no. 2 aforesaid was decided against the plaintiff and it was held that there is .....

Bijay Kumar Tiwary and Lalan Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR683; [2007(1)JCR583(Jhr)]

..... has been raped. the medical evidence along with evidence of these two witnesses, pw 2 and 4 supports the fact that these two witnesses were subjected to forceful sexual intercourse. the testimony of these two witnesses during their lengthy cross examination could not be discredited. they have withstood the cross examination by specifically naming the ..... 395, 376 ipc against this appellant, he cannot be held guilt for offence under section 3(2) of sc st act because the offences were not committed treating the victims dalit. we do not find any force in the contention of mr. pandey, as the evidence on record goes to prove otherwise. the genesis of occurrence itself ..... says that the offences were committed under various provisions of sc st act, 1989. all these aspects have been considered by the learned trial .....

Mathura Sao and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(2)BLJR1029; II(2003)DMC578; [2003(2)JCR595(Jhr)]

..... ) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.' 14. for the purpose of this section 'cruelty' shall have the ..... ; (4) such cruelty or harassment should be for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry.' 10. section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 defines 'dowry' as under :-- 'dowry' means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly-- (a) by any party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage; or ..... that the witnesses could not say about the date, day or month of the said demand. he denied flatly that he got the said letter written by babu lal with force. thus by this suggestion itself, it goes to establish that the said letter (ext. 2) was actually written by appellant babu lal sao who was also examined under section .....

Smt. Hira Mani Devi Vs. Bansi Ram and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2004Jhar77; [2003(4)JCR256(Jhr)]

..... . her son ayodhya ram and her four daughters have succeeded her having equal shares therein. the hindu women's rights to property act, 1937 came into force on 14th april, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as the act). prior to that a widow of the coparceners constituting the joint family had no right whatsoever in the joint family, property and ..... the plaintiff appellant that both the courts below had concurrently held that triveni ram died in the year 1952-53 i.e. before the commencement of the hindu succession act, 1956 leaving behind ayodhya ram and four daughters. it has also been held by the lower appellate court below that madoda @ madodra devi is the widow of ..... learned appellate court below has held that triveni ram died in the year 1952-53 and his widow madoda @ madodra devi died after the enforcement of hindu succession act and her son ayodhya ram and four daughters are the heirs of madoda @ madodra devi having equal shares therein. the learned appellate court below has also held that .....

Makhan Lal HarnaraIn and ors. Vs. Karamchand Thaper and Bros. Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2004Jhar143; [2004(4)JCR626(Jhr)]

..... f. c. i. ltd. (supra) are relevant. for proper appreciation i quote the relevant excerpt from the aforesaid paragraphs which runs thus :--'............................................ the nationalisation act came into force in the year 1974 by reason of which the assets of a debtor company stand vested in the state. in terms of the provisions of nationalisation ..... both the creditor and the guarantor some relief as specified between section 130 to 141 of the contract act. the creditor had three sources of repayment i.e. the creditor may sue the principal debtor, sell the securities on the basis of which the loan has been advanced; or sue the surety that is the guarantor ..... act there was appointed a commissioner of payments and by reason of the factum of the appellant herein being a secured creditor, lodged its claim before the commissioner of .....

Mathura Sao and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT(Cri)18; 2003(51)BLJR1029; II(2003)DMC578a

..... ) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person relate to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.'14. for the purpose of this section 'cruelty' shall have the ..... husband;(4) such cruelty or harassment should be for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry.'10. section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 defines 'dowry' as under :' 'dowry' means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly :(a) by any party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage; or ..... that the witnesses could not say about the date, day or month of the said demand. he denied flatly that he got the said letter written by babu lal with force. thus by this suggestion itself, it goes to establish that the said letter (ext. 2) was actually written by appellant babu lal sao who was also examined under section .....

Sri Ganesh Fabrics and ors. Vs. Smt. Sita Devi and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR96(Jhr)]

..... and against the appellants.question (c).-yes in view of the answer to question and air 1979 cal 135, the suit for ejectment under b.b.c. act is maintainable. the question is answered accordingly as against the appellants.question (d).---the family arrangement, made subsequent to some portion does not require registration but for ..... created air 1969 sc 109 is not applicable in such a situation.18. now the answer to the substantial questions :question (a).-the appellate court has not acted only on oral evidence, it has considered the document and appreciated them properly. this question is thus answered in negative and against the appellants.question (b),-the ..... remains.15. the plaintiff had proved the ext. 4 license for running hotel, ext. 5, weekly closure notice, ext 4/a registration under shop and establishment act read with the oral evidence of payment of rent, thought not very satisfactory but the preponderance of evidence read with the admission of possession without proving of partition .....

Md. Farooq @ Raju and Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

..... formal witness who has proved the sanction order of the deputy commissioner sanctioning the prosecution of the appellants for the offence under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and pw- 10,ramashish singh, the investigating officer, who has investigated the matter and submitted the charge-sheet.5. the accused-appellants were examined under section ..... 498a ipc and six months rigorous imprisonment under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act. all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.2. briefly stated, the facts of the case is that a written report was lodged by talat ..... 34 of 1988 by which the accused appellants have been convicted under sections 302, 498a of the indian penal code and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and and each of them have been sentenced to imprisonment for life under section 302 of the indian penal code and three years rigorous imprisonment under section .....