Booted - Judgment Search Results
Royal Boot House and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-06-1984
Reported in: AIR1985SC1759; 1986Supp(1)SCC739; [1984]56STC212(SC)
ORDER1. These special leave petitions arise in a case where the amount of tax due on the basis of the quarterly return furnished by the petitioner has not been paid before the expiry of the last...
Boots Company Plc, England and anr. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumb ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR36; (2002)3BOMLR574; 2002(2)MhLj834
J.A. Patil, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (for short, the Act, 1958) challenging the order dated 27-3-1998 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks...
Star Boots Company Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-09-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Jhar39; [2003(3)JCR678(Jhr)]
of starting a project and a registration certificate was also issued for carrying on manufacturing activity of safety boots. Pursuant to the said allotment a registered lease deed was executed in the year 1995. It is contended
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Capital Boot House and ors. Vs. Intercraft Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-1999
Reported in: 1999(51)DRJ245
are as follows:'2. That the agency business shall be carried out in the name and style of Capital Boot House at premises No. 24-B, Connaught Place. The business will be carried on only on the ground floor
M/S. Boots Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2011
that time we have decided to exit the agreement and some time during that time frame we advised Boots of our decision. So, the further continuation of correspondence was not of interest to us. Q. How many
Tvl. Boot Captive Power Service(P)ltd. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-08-2011
1. The petitioner seeks a Writ in the nature of declaration declaring the notification No.No.II(1)CTRE/100/97 issued vide G.O.Ms.No.528, CT & RE, dated 21.11.1997, as amended by Notification No.II(i)/CTRE/43(a-3)/98, issued vide G.O.Ms.No.104, CT&RE, dated 01.04.1998 as illegal...
Sharma Boot House Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-07-1985
Reported in: [1987]65STC258(All)
Anshuman Singh, J.1. This revision application is directed against the order dated April 23, 1985, passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Saharanpur, relating to assessment year 1978-79.2. The applicant is a registered dealer and carrying on...
Harijan Boot House Vs. Registrar of Firms
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-11-1987
Reported in: (1988)1GLR11; [1988]171ITR549(Guj)
A.P. Ravani, J.1. Should the application for recording of changes in the constitution of a firm be submitted within a specified time-limit and should the same be submitted in person and not by post The aforesaid...
Frontier Boot House Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1967
Reported in: [1969]23STC414(MP)
1. The Sales Tax Tribunal (Board of Revenue, M.P.), at the instance of the assessee, has made this reference under Section 44(1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The questions referred to us...
Boots Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-04-1999
Reported in: (2000)(115)ELT829Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The appellants manufacture 'Sweetex Pellets' and 'Sweetex Liquid'.They claimed classification under Heading 2925.00 which was approved by the Assistant Collector. Against this approval the department caused an appeal to be filed, on the ground that...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free