Booming - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 23 1909

North Shore Boom and Driving Co. Vs. Nicomen Boom Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-23-1909

North Shore Boom & Driving Co. v. Nicomen Boom Co. - 212 U.S. 406 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court North Shore Boom

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1884

Susquehanna Boom Co. Vs. West Branch Boom Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-07-1884

Susquehanna Boom Co. v. West Branch Boom Co. - 110 U.S. 57 (1884) U.S. Supreme Court Susquehanna Boom Co. v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2026

Big Bang Boom Solutions Private Limited Vs The Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-04-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Big Bang Boom Solutions Private Limited Represented by Its Director Mr.G.Sathyanarayanan No.265/3 KG Pinnacle Office 9-A 9th Floor Gandhi Street 100

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jan 21 2026

Shivakumar V @ Boom Shiva vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-21-2026

2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15682 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHIVAKUMAR V @ BOOM SHIVA S/O V.VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/O NO.2, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, PRIYANKANAGAR K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2016

Boom Investments Private Limited vs.mohair Investment and Trading Comp ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-24-2016

10.2016 In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent applicable): Boom Investments Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferor Company WITH Mohair Investment and Trading Company Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. N.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1990

Boom Footwear Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-23-1990

Reported in: (1990)(30)LC33Tri(Delhi)

1. Being dissatisfied with the order of confiscation of the imported goods namely shoe uppers made of canvas and PVC Leather Cloth with an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

1878