Bones - Judgment Search Results

Bone Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

BONE v. UNITED STATES - 374 U.S. 503 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court BONE v. UNITED STATES, 374 U.S. 503

Bone Vs. Marion County

Court: US Supreme Court

Bone v. Marion County - 251 U.S. 134 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Bone v. Marion County, 251 U.S. 134

Rajeshwar Baburao Bone Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.5778 of 2015 [Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.10430 of 2014]. Rajeshwar Baburao Bone …..Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra and Another …..Respondent(s) ORDER M. Y. EQBAL, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal by

Hindustan Bone Mills Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2006]144STC117(All)

brief facts of the case are that the applicant was carrying on the business of manufacturing of crushed bone from raw-Bones. The bone was liable to tax at the point of sale to consumer. Applicant had purchased

K.B. Bone Mills Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)20VST960(All)

No. 7038 dated January 31, 1985, the applicant was not liable for payment of tax in respect of bone meal and bone meal powder which was sold by the applicant?3. Whether the description of the goods sold

Swapana Bone Mealco. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the District Level Commitee for Sal ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2008)14VST106(Ker)

ORDERIn the above circumstances the Salestax Exemption application of M/s.Swapna Bone Meal Company Private Limited, Arackappady is hereby rejected.GENERAL MANAGER.2. Petitioner, being aggrieved by the said order, had filed

Swapna Bone Meal Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. District Level Committee for Sales ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2006]143STC504(Ker)

C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.1. Petitioner, a private limited company engaged in production of crushed bones, bone meal and tallow, has filed these two writ petitions, one challenging the denial of sales tax exemption

Popular Bone Mills Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1993]91STC334(Kar)

petitioner has paid court-fee governing three revision petitions. 2. There is no dispute that the petitioner purchased the bone and thereafter bone meal was prepared out of the bone purchased and it was sold. There is also

Telangana Bone Mill and Fertilizer Co., Rep. by Partner Vs. the State ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(1)ALT679

The assessee is carrying on business of exporting bone-meal, bone-sinews etc. He purchases in the local market raw bones, crushes the bones and the produce of bone-meal and bone-sinews are exported. It is the assesse's Case that,

Bharat Bones and Fertilizer Mills Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1991)99PLR80

maintain proper file with respect to the correspondence between the bank and the firm described as M/s Bharat Bones and Fertilizer Mills, Sodhiwala Road, Talwandi Bhai Tahsil and District Ferozepore, in respect of cash credit limit and