Blowing - Judgment Search Results
Blow Vs. North Carolina
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-01-1965
Blow v. North Carolina - 379 U.S. 684 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Blow v. North Carolina, 379 U.S. 684
M/S.BLOW PLAST INDUSTRIES Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
4155 & 4748 of 2026 & W.M.P.Nos. 4631, 5279 & 5280 of 2026 W.P.No. 4155 of 2026 M/s. Blow Plast Industries A registered partnership firm Represented by its Partner, Mr. Harsh Baid Having its Registered Office at.
Blow Plast Limited Vs. Mrs. Nafisa Shabbir HussaIn Mashraqui and Other ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-22-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALLMR606; 1998(1)BomCR54
ORDERS.H. Kapadia, J.1. This writ petition involves question of interpretation of section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to, for the sake of brevity, as 'the said Act, 1947') as applicable to the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Blow Plast Ltd. Vs. Nafisa Shabbir Hussian Mashraqui and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-22-1997
Reported in: (1998)ILLJ463Bom
1. This Writ Petition involves question of interpretation of See. 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to, for the sake of brevity, as 'the said Act, 1947,') as applicable to the facts of...
Bombay Glass Blowing Industries Vs. Bio Vaccines Private Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-25-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD390; [1999]98CompCas174(AP)
Matched in: Parties Bombay Glass Blowing Industries Vs. Bio Vaccines Private Limited
Blow Plast Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-11-2005
impugned order the Commissioner held that the goods namely, work station and office furniture systems manufactured by M/s Blow Plast Limited are classifiable under Chapter heading 94.03 of CETA; confirmed an amount of Rs. 52,35,216/- as duty
Blow Plast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-08-2005
Reported in: (2005)(192)ELT395Tri(Mum.)bai
1. In all the sixteen appeals filed by the appellants M/s. Blow Plast Ltd., the issue involved is identical and, as such, a common order is being passed. We have
Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Hoysala Blow Moulders (India) ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-13-2008
Reported in: [2009]317ITR284(KAR); [2009]317ITR284(Karn)
Deepak Verma, J.1. Heard Sri M.V. Seshachala, learned Counsel for the appellants. None appeared for the respondent even after service of the notice.2. The Revenue is in appeal against the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate...
Pan Office Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Blow Plast Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-28-2000
Reported in: [2003]115CompCas600(Kar)
T.N. Vallinayagam, J.1. The defendant in a suit for recovery of money based on two invoices is questioning the decree passed by the trial court in favour of the plaintiff-company. The fact that the supply was...
M/S. Hoysala Blow Moulders (India) Ltd., (in Liqn.) vs Nil
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-24-2026
NO. 318 OF 2025 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.5 OF 2001 CONNECTED WITH 15 OF 2002 BETWEEN: M/S. HOYSALA BLOW MOULDERS (INDIA) LTD., (IN LIQN.) REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free