Blooded - Judgment Search Results
Sartaj Blood Bank Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Health Secretar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR296(Jhr)]
the State Drug Control Authorities were directed not to accept or process any fresh application of 'Stand Alone Blood Bank' in private sector in view of the proposed amendment of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules.2. The case
Young Blood Yuva Samiti Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
Writ Petition (PIL) No.386/2007 (alongwith one connected matter) 1 127 & 128 D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.386/2007 Young Blood Yuva Samiti Vs State & ORS.D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.608/2007 Chetan Singh Gehlot & Anr Vs State &
Kaveri Blood Bank Vs. Smt. Asiya Sultana and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2010
who after examination advised operation to avert cancerous effect. Opposite party No.1 also advised the patient to have blood transfusion before operation since her hemoglobin level was low and referred her to opposite party No.2, blood bank
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex. Vs. Blood Care Collection Centre
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-08-2006
1. This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 16.6.2005 wherein the Commissioner (Appeals) has reduced the penalty imposed under Section 76 to Rs. 1,500/- from Rs. 5,000/- but upheld the other penalties.2. None appeared for...
J. Gopal Vs. Nagarjuna Blood Bank
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-31-2003
2 hospital who diagnosed the disease allergic breathlessness and anaemic. Since the body was anaemic the doctor advised blood transfusion and accordingly as per the advise of the said doctor the complainant approached opposite party No. 1
Managing Committee of Blood Bank vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissio ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-21-2024
GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1945 PETITIONERS: 1 MANAGING COMMITTEE OF BLOOD BANK, TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2 SUPERINTENDENT / CONVENER, MANAGING COMMITTEE OF
The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. M/s. United Racing and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
of such notice has opined as under to re-open the concluded assessment: The assessee M/s United Racing and Bloodstock Breeders Ltd., has filed return of income for the A.Y. 2003-04 on 27.11.2003 declaring total loss of Rs.3,49,80,579/-.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S United Racing & Blood Stock Bre ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3) C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.2. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, STANDING COUNSEL) AND: M/S UNITED RACING & BLOOD STOCK BREEDERS PVT. LTD., UB ANCHORAGE, NO.100/1, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE. (BY SMT. S.R. ANURADHA, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT2THIS APPEAL IS
M/S. Bio Line India Vs. M/S. Bajaj Blood Bank
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
1. In a complaint case bearing No.695/2008 filed by the complainant against the Bio-Line India, Indore, pending before District Forum(Central) proceedings were ex-parte against the OP, and the Forum decreed the claim of the complainant ex-parte...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free