Blindness - Judgment Search Results

Jaikishan Aggarwal (Blind) vs.hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. & Ors.

Court: Delhi

and allotment of retail outlet by HPCL. Therefore, the said petitions were taken up together.3. The petitioner is blind and falls under the category of Persons with Disabilities. At the material time, when W.P (C) 8299/2009 was

Jaikishan Aggarwal (Blind) vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

and allotment of retail outlet by HPCL. Therefore, the said petitions were taken up together.3. The petitioner is blind and falls under the category of Persons with Disabilities. At the material time, when W.P (C) 8299/2009 was

The Blind Relief Association and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra a ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2000(1)ALLMR460; 2000(2)BomCR262; (2000)1BOMLR706; 2000(3)MhLj372

the controversy involved in this case.3. In 1969, the State of Maharashtra leased to the 1st plaintiff, the Blind Relief Association, a social organization a plot of land for 99 years for the purpose of constructing a

Vinod Kumar Vs. All India Blind Relief Society (Regd) and ors.

Court: Delhi

2013 + # ! VINOD KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Naresh Thanai, Advocate versus $ * ALL INDIA BLIND RELIEF SOCIETY (REGD) & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gajinder Kumar and

Union of India and anr. Vs. National Federation of the Blind and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

in all government establishments to the extent of 1 per cent each for the persons suffering from (i) blindness or low vision; (ii) hearing impairment; and (iii) locomotor disability or cerebral palsy. After enactment of the said

A.i. Confederation of the Blind and anr. Vs. U.O.i. (Union of India) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(3)SCALE397; (2004)10SCC191; 2002(2)LC934(SC)

vide Extraordinary Gazette Notification No. 178 dated 30.6.2001. In this list, the posts of University/College/School Teacher for the blind and low-vision have been listed at Sl. Nos. 24-27 on page No. 592. 4. ..... 5. ..... 6.

National Federation of Blind Vs. Union Public Service Commission and O ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1916; JT1993(2)SC541; (1993)IILLJ452SC; (1993)2MLJ105(SC); 1993(2)SCALE181; (1993)2SCC411; [1993]2SCR556; 1993(3)SLJ16(SC); (1993)3UPLBEC1653

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. National Federation of Blind - a representative body of visually handicapped persons in India - has filed this petition under Article 32

Rajender Jaina Vs. National Federation of the Blind and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Appellant Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Mr. Santosh Srivastava, Advs. along with appellant in person. versus NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, respondent no.2 in person. SI Bishambar Dayal, P.S. Connaught Place.

M. Ramar Vs. L. Subramanian, I.A.S., The District Collector, (The Chai ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Matched in: Parties M. Ramar Vs. L. Subramanian, I.A.S., The District Collector, (The Chairman), District Blindness Control Society, Madurai District

National Federation of the Blind vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

decision: November 12, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 3817/2018, CM Nos. 15143/2018, 18933/2018 & 18935/2018 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta (Sr. Adv.) petitioner in person with Mr. Shivankur Shukla, Adv. versus UNION