Bituminization - Judgment Search Results

Utah Fuel Co. Vs. National Bituminous Coal Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... contained the following in bold type this report is required under the provisions of the bituminous coal act of 1937 and is therefore confidential petitioners made returns upon these forms march ..... commission to disclose the details of reports concerning costs etc but petitioners insist that the bituminous coal act conferred no such power on the contrary definitely denies it the act contains .....

Keystone Bituminous Vs. Debenedictis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states court of appeals for the third circuit syllabus section 4 of pennsylvania s bituminous mine subsidence and land conservation act act prohibits coal mining that causes subsidence damage ..... and four corporations that are engaged either directly or through affiliates in underground mining of bituminous coal in western pennsylvania the members of the association and the corporate petitioners own .....

Granite Bituminous Pav Co. Vs. Landis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... co v landis 214 u s 504 1909 214 u s 504 granite bituminous paving co appellant v john landis et al no 528 may 17 1909 page 214 .....

Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. Vs. Adkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proscription of unfair trade practices the establishment of marketing rules respecting such sales of bituminous coal constitute regulations within the competence of congress under the commerce clause as stated ..... interstate commerce in coal footnote 5 sec 17 b provides the term bituminous coal includes all bituminous semibituminous and subbituminous coal and shall exclude lignite which is defined as .....

Dunlop India Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)LC611Tri(Delhi)

..... determination of carbon residue this appears to be a recognition by the government that bituminous substance percentage determination is impracticable this would tend to be confirmed by the government ..... petroleum distillates but whether the methods advocated will be suitable in separating asphalts asphaltenes bituminous substances from a product like dutrex rt is not known especially when reading .....

Gray Vs. Powell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... shall contain the following conditions and provisions which are intended to regulate interstate commerce in bituminous coal and which shall be applicable only to matters and transactions in or directly ..... bare question is presented whether the words the congress used bring the respondents within the bituminous coal code or exclude them from its operation in answering that question the director .....

Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. Vs. Mine Workers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... coal operators association concerning the application of the fair labor standards act to the bituminous coal mining industry certain questions have arisen that are disturbing to both employers ..... appalachian agreement entered into on may 12 1940 between twenty three district associations of bituminous coal operators comprising the appalachian coal producing area and the international union united .....

Carter Vs. Carter Coal Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... legislation begins with 2 which establishes in the department of the interior a national bituminous coal commission to be appointed and constituted as the section then specifically provides upon ..... together and not separately constitute the means designated to bring about the stabilization of bituminous coal production and thereby to regulate or affect interstate commerce in such coal the .....

National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S. Lanco Infratech Ltd

Court: Delhi

..... as an anti stripping agent either further morth s manual for construction and supervision of bituminous work specifically mentions that hydrated lime may on occasions be used instead of propriety sic ..... their order of 3 october 2005 the tribunal amended the award and directed that for bituminous works bc the additional expenditure incurred on transportation of aggregates from pakur shall be worked .....

Nav Bharat Enterprises (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)(13)ELT1134TriDel

..... to conform to this part of the specifications in respect of bituminous content the learned counsel for the appellant held that all ..... quarter of 1 the item does not contemplate a presence of bituminous substance but a presence of as little as possible of such ..... must go against the appellant the subject of the presence of bituminous substance was vehemently argued by the learned counsel for the appellant .....