Biology - Judgment Search Results

Biological E Ltd and Anr Vs. National Pharamaceutical Pricing Authorit ...

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.31/2015 Pronounced on:22. 01.2015 BIOLOGICAL E LTD & ANR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abdullah Hussain, Mr. Koshy

Biocon Biologics India Limited vs National Pharmaceutical Pricing Auth ...

Court: Karnataka

WRIT PETITION NO.33628 OF 2011 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.33849 OF 2011 (GM-RES) IN WP No.33628/2011 BETWEEN: BIOCON BIOLOGICS INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOW AS BIOCON BIOLOGICS INDIA LIMITED) A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES

Genemedix Biological Pvt. Ltd. Vs. K. Narayana Reddy and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD42

B. Prakash Rao, J.1. Appellant herein is defendant No. 4 who filed this appeal challenging the orders passed on 3-1-2007 in I.A. No. 3978 of 2006 in O.S. No. 459 of 2006 on the file of...

Biologic and Psychotropic India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Triton Health Care Pvt. ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003(26)PTC180(Del)

stated that the said trade mark was assigned in favor of the plaintiff by the assignor, namely, M/s Biologic & Psychotropic India (P) Ltd., who is using the trade mark TRIFLU PLUS in respect of pharmaceuticals since

Biological E. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1997]104STC234(Kar)

S. Rajendra Babu, J. 1. This petition is filed by a manufacturer of pharmaceutical preparations. A notification was issued by the first respondent as under : 'In exercise of the powers conferred by section 8A of...

Hindustan Biologicals Ltd. Vs. Jagat Narain

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1953All715; [1953]23CompCas58(All)

applicant under Section 282A, Indian Companies Act should be set aside.2. On 14-3-1950 the complainant applicant, The Hindustan Biologicals Limited through Amaresh-war Ghosh filed a complaint against the opposite party Sri Jagat Narain Rohatgi purporting to be

Ventri Biologicals Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)LC788Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellant manufactures vaccines for poultry. These vaccines are of seven types - each for a specific disease. The technology employed by the appellant results in the separation of the vaccines into two constituents. One...

Hindustan Biologicals Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)LC247Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The applicants in this case manufactured medicaments. Their classification lists for Alphadine month wash and Topical Solution claiming classification under sub-heading 300310 was approved by the Jurisdictional Assistant Collector without any objection on 20-7-1994.Their other...

Biological E. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2001)(94)LC696Tri(Hyd.)erabad

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants who are a reputed and professionally managed company and are availing Modvat credit on various items including items of imported goods. They took credit of the entire...

Hindustan Biologicals Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT543Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellants challenge the order of the lower authorities whereby the appellants products "Albendazole Suspension" has been classified under chapter sub heading No. 3003.10 of the tariff, as against the claim of the appellants seeking...