Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar reorganisation act 2000 section 29 practice and procedure in high court Page 5 of about 329 results (0.124 seconds)

Dec 15 2005 (HC)

Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Molan Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the state of jharkhand has rightly drawn the attention of this court of section 53 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2002 read with schedule viii, 1 arid 2.53. pension.-the liability of the existing state of bihar in respect of pensions and other retirement benefits shall pass to, or be apportioned between the successor ..... states of bihar and jharkhand in accordance with the provisions contained in the eight schedule of this act.the eight schedule.-apportionment of liability in respect of pensions and other retirement benefits :1. subject to the ..... the said adjustment, the liability in respect of pensions and other retirement benefits of officers serving in connection with the affairs of the existing state of bihar who retire or proceeded on leave preparatory to retirement before the appointed day, but whose claims for pensions and other retirement benefits are outstanding immediately .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2007 (HC)

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar60; 2008(56)BLJR412; [2008(1)JCR580(Jhr)]

..... (supply) act, 1948 read with section 62(4) of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 constituted the jharkhand state electricity board for the state of jharkhand which became functional ..... and examined.27. after coming into force of the electricity regulatory commission act, 1998, the power to frame tariff and to decide the tariff rests with the state regulatory commissions, as envisaged under section 29 of the said act.28. after creation of state of jharkhand under the provision of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, the state government in exercise of its power under the electricity .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2006 (HC)

Jharkhand State Cricket Association and ors. Vs. the Board of Control ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar26; [2006(4)JCR11(Jhr)]

..... established with its head quarter at jamshedpur in the year 1935. since its very inception, bsca has been a full member of the bcci. after the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 came into force, a special general body meeting of bsca was held on 7.1.2001, wherein it was decided that two adhoc committees be appointed for ..... the two states to deal with the matter. consequently, the two associations, namely, jharkhand state cricket association (in short 'jsca') having its headquarters at jamshedpur and bihar state cricket association (in short 'bsca'), having its headquarter at patna came into existence. in 2001, a dispute arose in between the two associations as to ..... chennai on 23rd november 2005 that the minutes of the special general meeting held at chennai on 12thseptember 2004 approving the change i the name of bihar cricket association to jharkhand state cricket association were not confirmed at the subsequent annual general meeting at kolkata on 26thseptember 2004. a careful perusal of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2005 (HC)

RobIn Tirkey Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR62(Jhr)]

..... rules relating to the recruitment of constables have been adopted with relaxations and modifications, in purported exercise of power under section 85 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. the petitioner has also prayed for quashing the advertisement no. 1/2004 issued by the respondent no. 3 whereby the applications have been ..... higher educational qualification. the respondents emphasized that the government of jharkhand is not bound to adopt the recruitment policy and procedures of the state of bihar and it has got its own prudence and power to prescribe educational qualification for recruitments. according to the respondents, the candidates are to be selected ..... there is no element of any discrimination, arbitrariness or irrationality as has been alleged by the petitioner. learned counsel submitted that rule 666 of the bihar police manual prescribes educational qualification but the said rule is only regulatory and is open to relaxation even by the selection board. learned counsel relied on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2005 (HC)

Yogendra Thakur and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... consider the cases of the petitioners for their regularisation keeping in view the exact number of class iv vacancies in the existing state of bihar after coming into force of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. the respondent secretary aforesaid, at the same time, shall keep in view the scheme framed by it for regularisation and thus, on ..... to aforesaid order, an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the principal chief conservator, government of bihar, patna, wherein it is stated that as against the existing 26 vacancies, the government has taken decision to retain only 12 posts of forest guard and ..... no. 9158 of 2001.10. this court, vide order dated 25.1.2005, had directed the principal chief conservator of forest and environment department, government of bihar, patna, to put in affidavit disclosing the exact number of class iv vacancies in forest extension division, patna and sanjay gandhi biological park, patna.11. pursuant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2006 (HC)

Dr. Subhash Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Departm ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(2)JCR372(Jhr)]

..... period of study.5. after the disposal of the said case, the petitioner was finally allocated the state of bihar under section 72(2) of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. he joined the services under the state of bihar, but was not allowed study leave to complete the study for which permission had already been granted by the government ..... of jharkhand. the aforesaid fact having taken notice of, this court vide order dated 6th july, 2005 allowed the state of bihar to accept ..... referred to as the university), where he has already completed much more than one year study.2. the petitioner was in the services of erstwhile state of bihar in its animal husbandry and fishery department since 1989. he requested the department for no objection for pursuing study of m.v.sc. course. persons junior to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2005 (HC)

Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(2)JCR537(Jhr)]

..... of share holders and other share holders have not been impleaded as party to the instant writ petition.3. it is stated that the provision of section 47 of the bihar reorganisation act is not applicable in the present case.4. we have perused the prayer made in the writ petition and the facts pleaded including the prayer as made at clause (d ..... and under which provision of law?6. it would be open to the bsidc to file a simple affidavit and state that they are not going to wind-up the bihar air products ltd., jamshedpur not in wants to interfere with the management and affairs of the state government.7. mr. a. allam, learned counsel appearing for the state of ..... will not make any interference with the functioning of bihar air products ltd., jamshedpur without prior permission of the court. however, this order will not stand in the way of the management of the company or any interested party to take steps or any action as per law such as the companies act.9. let copy of this order be handed over .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2005 (HC)

Tata Cummins Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Commissioner of Comme ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(2)JCR146(Jhr)]; [2006]148STC190(Jharkh)

..... engineering and locomotive co. ltd. (telco) in wp (t) no. 2587 of 2003.6. in the meantime, the state of bihar-was reorganized under the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 and two successor states bihar and jharkhand were created. the petitioner tata-cummins ltd. having its office at jamshedpur, fell within the territorial jurisdiction of the state of ..... of jharkhand, thereafter, issued notifications being so, nos. 65, 66 and 67 all dated 12th january, 2002 in exercise of power under section 22 of bihar finance act, 1981 (bihar act 5 of 1981) and allowed the benefits in terms of the provisions of jharkhand industrial policy, 2001.7. in the writ petition, wp (t) no. ..... benefit of 'set-off of sales lax' having announced vide jharkhand industrial policy, 2001, the state of jharkhand in exercise of power under section 22 of the bihar finance act, 1981, issued different notifications bearing so nos. 65, 66 and 67, all dated 12th january, 2002 allowing such benefits.sub-clause (2) of clause (1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2009 (SC)

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Shiv Karampal Sahu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3714(SC); [2009(121)FLR730]; 2009(6)SCALE261; (2009)11SCC453

..... the government at that time.however, on or about 7.5.2003, the government of jharkhand, which came into being in terms of the provisions of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 took a policy decision that the matter relating to the appointment of the dependent of the deceased in the terrorist violence should be given effect to in respect ..... contingent expenses were also contemplated thereby.5. indisputably, father of the respondent was not a government servant. he was allegedly killed by extremists on 19.5.2000.the state of bihar adopted another scheme for grant of appointment on compassionate ground to the dependents of those who have been killed in the terrorist attacks, as would appear ..... as the state of jharkhand in the circular letter dated 7.5.2003 adopted the earlier circular letters issued by the state of bihar only in respect of cases where death had occurred after 15.10.2000, i.e., the date from which the state of jharkhad came into being, the high court, in our opinion, committed a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2005 (HC)

Praveen Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... the tax for this vehicle and holds valid goods carriage permit bearing permit no. 325 of 2000 (annexure-5) which was valid from 23.7.2000 to 22.7.2005 and as such in terms of section 67 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 (in short the act) there was no tax liability on the petitioner.4. the petitioner has further submitted that this ..... court in the case of manoj sahay v. state of bihar, 2002 (i) pljr 666 had held that where the transport permits are valid for remainder ..... appear that the petitioner was granted this permit on payment of necessary taxes prior to 23.7.2000 at hazaribagh on the date when the state of jharkhand was not carved out as a result of this act. on the said date bihar state was. also having offices at various places including hazaribagh and it was at this place that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //