Court : Supreme Court of India
..... common impugned order dated 3.3.2016.14. on behalf of the appellants, it was contended that in view of sections 84 & 85 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, the 1963 bihar rules were deemed to have been operating in the newly created state of jharkhand. however, this position was prevalent under the 7 2001 rules but when ..... i of this rule. (emphasis supplied) 12. the accepted factual position is that the jharkhand state was carved out of the state of bihar in terms of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 on 15.11.2000. rule 22 of the 2001 rules refers to the requirement of passing examinations from time to time prescribed by the departmental examination rules, ..... to the area of the new state. thus, the pre-existing laws in the unified state of bihar, it was opined as per the high court, would continue to apply to the new state created under the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 only until otherwise provided by the competent legislature or other competent authority. the 2001 rules, it is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... solicitor general. it was then submitted that the rights of the oci cardholders cannot be claimed beyond the notification issued under section 7b of the citizenship act. he submitted that therefore, the rationale lies in not grouping the oci cardholder with indian citizen for applying 371j reservation. 4.5 learned additional ..... undisputedly stated. the petitioner stayed upto 4th december 2018 in the foreign country- britain. he submitted that by virtue of section 9 of the citizenship act, which contemplate the circumstances leading to termination of citizenship, the petitioner s citizenship of india ceased. it was the next submission that the petitioner as ..... being enjoyed by the petitioners. though the notification was sustained as having been backed by competent sovereign power - 28 - under the statute of citizenship act, it was held that it is sustainable prospectively only. it was ruled that the portion of the notification which provide for suppression of the earlier notifications .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pointed out by the learned senior counsel for the respondent that in the said case, juvenile justice (cadre and protection of children) act, 2000 section 49 and section 7a and other provisions of the said act has been dealt, wherein the hon ble supreme court has no occasion to deliberate the provisions of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled ..... in the sale deeds dated 28-09-1988, 4.06.1991, 3-08- 1991, 4-03-1993, 3-01-1994, 29.01.1994, 30-08-1995, 14-11-2000 and 28-09-2001 of one sri gangadharaiah father in law of the appellant, govindu, grand-father of the appellant, gangireddy and anjinappa, uncles of the appellant, d.nagaraj ..... to budaga jangama as required under sub- section (5) of section 4a of the karnataka scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes (reservation of appointment, etc.) act, 1990.34. regarding the gazetteer pertaining to the kolar district relied by the appellant, as rightly pointed by the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no.3, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... discussed in the previous segment, the constitution confers legislative and executive powers on the states, which play an indispensable role in our democratic set-up. 357 uttar pradesh reorganisation act 2000 358 bihar reorganisation act 2000 359 andhra pradesh reorganisation act 2014 339 part e these characteristics of states are not usually lost when its boundaries, size, or name are changed.500. states under the indian constitution have their ..... (alteration of name) act 1973, uttaranchal (alteration of name) act 2006, orissa (alteration of name) act 2011. 350 bombay reorganisation act 1960 351 state of nagaland act 1962 352 north-eastern areas (reorganisation) act 1971 353 assam reorganisation (meghalaya) act 1969 354 punjab reorganisation act 1966 355 madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 356 constitution (thirty-sixth amendment) act 1975 338 part e pradesh.357 similarly, jharkhand was carved out of the state of bihar.358 most recently .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... decision, so long as it is otherwise in conformity with the provisions of ibc and the regulations under the enactment.45. certain foreign jurisdictions allow resolution/reorganisation plans to be challenged on grounds of fairness and equity. one of the grounds under which a company voluntary arrangement can be challenged under the united kingdom ..... the nclt for fresh/de novo consideration, but being conscious of the fact that such course would impede quick resolution 15 raj kishore jha v state of bihar, (2003) 11 scc519 41 as the cirp is in a stalemate right from 01.09.2021 and after having applied our minds to the factual aspects also ..... and the subsidiary of such subsidiary, has taken place in a previous year pursuant to a resolution plan approved by the tribunal under section 242 of the companies act, 2013 (18 of 2013) after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional principal commissioner or commissioner. explanation. for the purposes of this section, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... investigation to the ccb police. the learned senior counsel also brought to the notice that the same procedure was followed in delhi police establishment act, national investigation agency act, ndps act, lokayuktha act and contended that, in this case, there is no statutory power for the government to issue such a notification. hence, prayed for quashing ..... , prayed for dismissing the petition. in support of his contentions, learned senior counsel for the respondent - de-facto complainant relied on the following decisions:1. state of bihar and another vs. lalu singh - (2014) 1 scc6632. state of kerala vs. p.b. sourabhan and others - (2016) 4 scc1023. mr. magadi shankar ..... s. mohan lal harbans lal bhayana - (2014) 3 scr1629. aayush buildwell pvt. ltd. vs. haryana urban development authority & ors.-. (2014) 3 scr18110. nand kumar vs. state of bihar & ors.-. (2014) 3 scr19311. rajkumar vs. state of m.p.-. (2014) 3 scr21212. pal singh and another. vs. state of punjab - (2014) 3 scr23120 13. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... investigation to the ccb police. the learned senior counsel also brought to the notice that the same procedure was followed in delhi police establishment act, national investigation agency act, ndps act, lokayuktha act and contended that, in this case, there is no statutory power for the government to issue such a notification. hence, prayed for quashing ..... , prayed for dismissing the petition. in support of his contentions, learned senior counsel for the respondent - de-facto complainant relied on the following decisions:1. state of bihar and another vs. lalu singh - (2014) 1 scc6632. state of kerala vs. p.b. sourabhan and others - (2016) 4 scc1023. mr. magadi shankar ..... s. mohan lal harbans lal bhayana - (2014) 3 scr1629. aayush buildwell pvt. ltd. vs. haryana urban development authority & ors.-. (2014) 3 scr18110. nand kumar vs. state of bihar & ors.-. (2014) 3 scr19311. rajkumar vs. state of m.p.-. (2014) 3 scr21212. pal singh and another. vs. state of punjab - (2014) 3 scr23120 13. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... in (2000)6 scc715 on the ground that, an executive act cannot over write judicial decision and that, in view of article 214 of the constitution of india only one seat at principal seat is provided and the establishment of circuit benches is in violation of sections 51 and 69 of the states reorganisation act and contrary ..... judges must deliver judgments within a reasonable time and in that matter, the guidelines given by the apex court in the case of anil rai vs. state of bihar, (2001)7 scc318must be scrupulously observed, both in civil and criminal cases. (4) considering the staggering arrears, vacations in the higher judiciary must be curtailed by ..... air1985kar 99 (para34) 22. m.i.builders pvt. ltd., vs. radhey shyam sahu and others - air1999sc2468.. (para82) 23. tirupati balaji developers pvt. ltd., vs. state of bihar -(2004) 5 scc1(para 21 and24) vi. arguments advanced by sri shanti bhushan, learned deputy solicitor general of india for respondent no.135. per contra, sri h. shanthi bhushan, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of quasi- governmental private control over the major assets of a nation. properly, thereby, is subject to regulation. the directive principles enjoin the state to reorganise the economic system by law or administrative means and the fundamental rights are means to that end to make right to life meaningful, equality of opportunity and ..... even such factors lend legitimacy to legislative the actions of the state. in support of this submission, he is more than justified in banking upon state of bihar vs. sir kameshwar singh wherein, at concluding portion of paragraph 208, it is observed as under: in my opinion, legislation which aims at elevating the ..... was letter correspondence between the state government and the central government that inter alia mentioned article 254(2), on the assumption that the impugned act was in derogation of 1882 act & 1908 act. as already mentioned above, none of these letters was written with the concurrence of the governor, nor any copy thereof was marked to his .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of quasi- governmental private control over the major assets of a nation. properly, thereby, is subject to regulation. the directive principles enjoin the state to reorganise the economic system by law or administrative means and the fundamental rights are means to that end to make right to life meaningful, equality of opportunity and ..... even such factors lend legitimacy to legislative the actions of the state. in support of this submission, he is more than justified in banking upon state of bihar vs. sir kameshwar singh wherein, at concluding portion of paragraph 208, it is observed as under: in my opinion, legislation which aims at elevating the ..... was letter correspondence between the state government and the central government that inter alia mentioned article 254(2), on the assumption that the impugned act was in derogation of 1882 act & 1908 act. as already mentioned above, none of these letters was written with the concurrence of the governor, nor any copy thereof was marked to his .....
Tag this Judgment!