Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar reorganisation act 2000 section 29 practice and procedure in high court Page 10 of about 329 results (0.160 seconds)

Sep 24 1971 (SC)

Gurcharan Dass Vaid Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC1640; (1971)3SCC697; [1972]1SCR896; 1972(4)LC170(SC)

..... relevant directions contained in paragraph (1) and (2) are as follows:in exercise of the powers conferred by section 117 of the states reorganisation act 1956 (act 37 of 1956) the central government hereby directs the government of punjab to determine the seniority, pay and other matters concerning the officers included ..... the central government under section 115 and only those directions which 'the central government can give under sections 117 read with sections 127 of the reorganisation act will govern the inter se seniority of the appellant and respondent 4. the appellant says that in raghavendra rao v. deputy commissioner south kanara ..... the chronology of the various orders, representations, notifications etc. with respect to the contestants in this appeal show that even 16 years after the states reorganisation act the trouble relating to integration of services, fixation of seniority, promotions, provisional lists, confirmations and deemed dates etc. still continue to trouble the courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2005 (HC)

Radhey Shyam Pandey Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR160(Jhr)]

..... his headquarters in the office of the chief engineer. water resources department. kanchi. alter the reorganization of the state of jharkhand under the provisions of bihar re-organisation act, 2000, a tentative list of cadre allocation was made by the cadre allocation committee. the petitioner's name appeared at sl. no. 78 in the ..... to have been allocated to the successor state of jharkhand with effect from the appointed date;(vi) under the provisions of section 72 of the bihar re-organisation act, 2000, the government of india is the final authority for allocating the cadre, it is the said statutory authority which had allocated jharkhand cadre to ..... the same is final and binding on the parties.9. section 72 of the bihar reorganization act, 2000, which deals with the provisions relating to the services in the respective states after reorganization, reads thus :-72. provisions relating to services in bihar and jharkhand.-(1) every person who immediately before the appointed day is serving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1976 (HC)

i. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1977AP178

..... .29. we can straightway dispose of the contention based upon explanation iv which merely says that under the act, 'telengana area' means the territories specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the state reorganisation act, 1956 and 'andhra area' means the territories of the state of andhra pradesh other than the telengana area ..... relevantwe shall read explanation iv also as a contention was raised with respect to that too.'in this act , 'telengana area' means the territories specified in sub-section (i) of section 3 of the states reorganisation act 1956 and 'andhra area' means the territories of the state of andhra pradesh other than the telengana ..... discriminated against leaving us at the mercy of the authorities who had to decide arbitrarily for want of specific guide lines in the provisions of the act and the rules made thereunder. therefore, it is prayed to provide guidelines by way of executive instructions and by making appropriate rules for this purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2008 (HC)

Nandlal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2664; 2008(3)MPHT50; 2007(1)MPLJ84

..... section 544 of the old code, which corresponds to section 312 of the new code, was duly adopted by the state of madhya pradesh as constituted under the state reorganization act, 1956.11. as explained by the madras high court in in re vendata air 1950 mad. 283, although the word 'witness' in section 312 (supra), includes both ..... under section 216, 244 or 257 of the code.explanation: cases instituted by police officers on other persons authorized by a municipal committee under the central provinces and berar municipalities act, 1922 (ii of 1922) or rules or bye-laws made thereunder are not cases falling under clause (a)(i) of this rule.10. the rule, though framed ..... defence:(i) cases prosecuted, instituted or carried on by, or under the orders of, or with the sanction of government or any judge, magistrate or other public officer acting as such,(ii) in cases in which the presiding officer considers such payments to be directly in furtherance of the public interest, and(iii) in all non-bailable .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 2002 (HC)

Samaresh Singh Etc. Vs. Syed Azmat HussaIn and ors. Etc.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1359

..... as was existing prior to the date of the pronouncement of the judgment under challenge in this appeal is required to be restored, keeping in view the spirit of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 and the need for maintaining the continuity in the functioning of the regional institute of technology, jamshedpur, accordingly, even while we are staying the operation of that portion of the ..... following order was passed :--'heard the parties with regard to the stay matter. on consideration of all the relevant aspects and specially in the light of the provisions of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, as well as on consideration of the various clauses of the articles of association of the society and on interpretation of various orders on the subject, we fell that status .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2007 (HC)

Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Patna

..... india in its ministry of home affairs by an order dated 16.12.2005 in exercise of powers conferred upon it under section 65(1) & (2) of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. in view of the order dated 16.12.2005 passed by the government of india, the government of jharkhand has issued notification contained in memo no. 334 dated 23 ..... and edible items. the area of activity of the corporation prior to coming into force of the bihar state re-organisation act, 2000 was within the entire erstwhile state of bihar. after bifurcation of the erstwhile state of bihar and creation of successor state of bihar and jharkhand, certain controversies with regard to extent of territorial jurisdiction of the corporation in regard to ..... , in the ministry of home affairs vide its order dated 13th september, 2004 in exercise of power conferred upon it under section 65(1) and (2) of bihar re-organisation act, 2000 and following directions were given based on the mutual agreement of both the states. (i) the share of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2003 (HC)

Arun Kumar Trivedi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR97(Jhr)]

..... case of the respondents therefore is that the jseb rightly declined to accept the services of the petitioner in jseb in accordance with the provisions of bihar reorganization act 2000.4. a separate counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the union of india wherein it is stated that ministry of power vide order dated ..... to first discuss the provisions of bihar reorganization act 2000 (in short the said act). the state of bihar was reorganized in view of the bihar reorganization act 2000 and the state of jharkhand came into existence with effect from 15.11.2000. in view of the provisions contained in section 62 of the said act, the state of jharkhand established separate ..... or mala fide.11. besides the above, from bare reading of the provisions of section 62 of the bihar re-organization act, 2000 coupled with order/guidelines issued by the central government both the state of bihar and the state of jharkhand could not have issued such order or notification of transfer and posting of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2003 (HC)

Nand Kishore Singh Vs. Yogendra Prasad and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR769(Jhr)]

..... non-productive nature of the expenditure incurred thus far. 6. the state of jharkhand came into existence on 15.11.2000. still there linger disputes with the state of bihar, to be resolved in terms of the bihar reorgnization act, 2000. but regarding a project like the one in question, it appears to us that it is for the state of ..... was estimated that the tentative tariff on completion of the project would be rs. 7.99 per unit. after bifurcation of the state of bihar and the creation of jharkhand with effect from 15.11.2000, a fresh decision has to be taken and a fresh power purchase agreement has to be entered into. but as of now, no ..... hydroelectric project was envisaged keeping in mind the potentiality of the project in the matter of generation of hydroelectric power. the relevant project report was prepared by the bihar state electricity board in the year 1973. this was preceded by a report of the central water power commission made during the hydroelectric survey of the central indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2002 (HC)

Lalu Prasad Alias Lalu Prasad Yadav Vs. State Through C.B.i. (A.H.D.)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003CriLJ610

..... separately. but admittedly no such application has been filed before the trial court.13. it is further submitted by the learned senior counsel that after corning into force of the bihar reorganization act, 2000, the supreme court of india transferred thirty six cases including those cases to the state of jharkhand as well as charge-sheet against the petitioner (lalu prasad) has also ..... is also alleged that the accused persons entered into a criminal conspiracy agreed to do or caused to be done illegal act or acts which were not legal by illegal means at deoghar, dumka, patna, ranchi and other places of bihar and outside bihar in other states.4. the short facts of rc 38(a)/96 as alleged is that it was registered in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1958 (HC)

Yadaorao Hanumantrao Deshmukh Vs. the Bombay Revenue Tribunal at Nagpu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1959Bom109; (1959)61BOMLR213; ILR1959Bom613

..... and ambit of that jurisdiction must be judged by the provisions of the madhya pradesh land revenue code and not by the provisions of the bombay revenue tribunal act. therefore, in our opinion, the revenue tribunal was in error in refusing to assume jurisdiction int he case of these appeals preferred by different patels whose services ..... manual and there is at page 79 of that manual a circular which says :'the proceedings of revenue officers under the land revenue code and other ailed acts as well as certain proceedings relating to general administration constitute revenue cases which are classified under the subject heads given in appendix i.'therefore, as far as ..... did by a notification which really calls for interpretation at our hands. the notification states :'in exercise of the powers conferred by section 122 of the states reorganization act, read with the provisions of laws referred to in columns 1 and 2 of the schedule hereto annexed, and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //