Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar reorganisation act 2000 section 29 practice and procedure in high court Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 95 results (0.345 seconds)

Ashok Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... common impugned order dated 3.3.2016.14. on behalf of the appellants, it was contended that in view of sections 84 & 85 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, the 1963 bihar rules were deemed to have been operating in the newly created state of jharkhand. however, this position was prevalent under the 7 2001 rules but when ..... i of this rule. (emphasis supplied) 12. the accepted factual position is that the jharkhand state was carved out of the state of bihar in terms of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 on 15.11.2000. rule 22 of the 2001 rules refers to the requirement of passing examinations from time to time prescribed by the departmental examination rules, ..... to the area of the new state. thus, the pre-existing laws in the unified state of bihar, it was opined as per the high court, would continue to apply to the new state created under the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 only until otherwise provided by the competent legislature or other competent authority. the 2001 rules, it is .....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Lafarge Dealers Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... two years, and thereafter by legislation. this decision had referred to several earlier enactments by the parliament under article 3 beginning with the states reorganisation act, 1956 till the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 which had similar provisions under the heading territorial extent of laws and power to adapt laws as in the present case. referring to section 84 ..... by way of amendment to the law as applicable to the newly formed state. while interpreting section 84 and 85 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 analogous to section 78 and 79 of the reorganisation act, this court in ranjan sinha (supra) had dealt with and affirmed the underlined theory of continuity of laws in the new ..... state would not be governed by any law. this is the true effect of the legal fiction created by section 84 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, i.e., the reorganisation of the state would not affect the applicability of the existing laws in the state to all territories included within it before and even .....

Kapila Hingorani and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR785]; [2008(3)JCR129(SC)]; (2008)IIILLJ1012SC; 2008(10)SCALE15

..... no. 12025/24/2004-sr dated 13.9.2004 had decided that bhalco continued to be under the control of the government of bihar in terms of section 65 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. it was, therefore, pleaded in that paragraph that bhalco and jhalco were two different corporations having no connection of inter dependence between them ..... government of jharkhand with all its liabilities and assets. the state of bihar then further has reiterated that the decision of the central government to treat bhalco as a property of ..... written submissions on behalf of state of bihar, all that is stated is that since bhalco was a corporation situated in the state of jharkhand and its area of operation was also in the state of jharkhand, only, therefore, under section 47(1) and section 56 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, bhalco is a corporation of the .....

Bihar State Electricity Board, and anr. Vs. Ram Deo Prasad Singh, and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , 2008. the appellants are now before this court assailing the judgments and decree passed against them. 4. in view of section 89 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 the judgments of the high court and the first appellate court appear to be manifestly illegal and without jurisdiction. it may be noted that the district ..... thermal power station is situated, was earlier part of the state of bihar but on bifurcation of the state with effect from november 15, 2000, the appointed date under the reorganisation act it forms part of the newly created state jharkhand. section 89 of the reorganisation act dealing with transfer of pending proceedings provides as follows - 89. transfer ..... lost sight of the fact that it was affirming a decree that was no longer executable or enforceable in the state of bihar. section 62 of the reorganisation act contains provisions relating to bihar state electricity board besides two other corporations and in so far as relevant for the present provides as under: - 62. .....

C.B.i., A.H.D., Patna Vs. Braj Bhushan Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2001VIIIAD(SC)356; AIR2001SC4014; 2001CriLJ4683; JT2001(8)SC348; 2001(6)SCALE641; (2001)9SCC432

..... mishra).3. the above indicated question winched to the fore on the midnight of 15th november, 2000, when the erstwhile state of bihar got itself bifurcated into two states by the act of parliament called the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 (for short 'the act'). one region of it became a new state called jharkhand while the remaining region became the present ..... state of bihar.4. we are told that 64 cases have been registered relating to fodder scam. all the cases were directed ..... the present question can be determined by reference to the provisions of pc act.30. the charge-sheets in all these cases were filed in the courts of the special judge at patna when the state of bihar remained undivided prior to 15.11.2000. by the notification dated 5.6.1996 (supra) that court was .....

Purushottam Kumar Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3655; [2006(3)JCR263(SC)]; JT2006(7)SC46; (2006)IIILLJ238SC; 2006(4)SCALE561; 2006(3)SLJ482(SC); (2006)9SCC458

..... government to curb misuse of public fund.by the bihar reorganization act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), the erstwhile state of bihar was bifurcated into two states; (1) state of bihar; and (2) state of jharkhand. by an order dated november 14, 2000, the appellant was provisionally transferred to the state of ..... jharkhand in the office of the registrar, co- operative societies, ranchi, jharkhand with effect from november 15, 2000 ..... concerned, the division bench, in our opinion, rightly referred to. sections 72 and 74 of the act, which are relevant and material. they read thus:72. provisions relating to services in bihar and jharkhand:(1) every person who immediately before the appointed day is serving in connection with the .....

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Shiv Karampal Sahu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3714(SC); [2009(121)FLR730]; 2009(6)SCALE261; (2009)11SCC453

..... the government at that time.however, on or about 7.5.2003, the government of jharkhand, which came into being in terms of the provisions of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 took a policy decision that the matter relating to the appointment of the dependent of the deceased in the terrorist violence should be given effect to in respect ..... contingent expenses were also contemplated thereby.5. indisputably, father of the respondent was not a government servant. he was allegedly killed by extremists on 19.5.2000.the state of bihar adopted another scheme for grant of appointment on compassionate ground to the dependents of those who have been killed in the terrorist attacks, as would appear ..... as the state of jharkhand in the circular letter dated 7.5.2003 adopted the earlier circular letters issued by the state of bihar only in respect of cases where death had occurred after 15.10.2000, i.e., the date from which the state of jharkhad came into being, the high court, in our opinion, committed a .....

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2871; 2005(2)BLJR1168; 2005(99)ECC689; [2005(2)JCR235(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC582; (2005)4SCC272; [2005]140STC284(SC)

..... a cold rolling mill. on or about 10.1.1998, the government of bihar acknowledged that the appellant was 'going to diversity its plant'. in terms of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, the state of jharkhand was created with effect from. 15.11.2000, as a result whereof, inter alia, the 1981 act was extended to the state of jharkhand.6. the appellant claimed benefits of the ..... aforementioned notification nos. 478 and 479 dated 22.12.1995 whereupon by an order dated 16.12.2000 the benefit of exemption in .....

Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Yadav Vs. State Through C.B.i. (A.H.D.) Ranc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3838; 2003CriLJ4452; JT2003(Suppl1)SC32; 2003(6)SCALE674; (2006)6SCC661; 2004(1)LC70(SC)

..... , in the case of cbi v. braj bhushan prasad : 2001crilj4683 considered the question whether these cases stood transferred to the state of jharkhand by virtue of the bihar reorganisation act. opposing a transfer it was submitted that the cases related to an alleged single conspiracy which had taken place in patna. it was submitted that the trials thus ..... to apply for amalgamation at a later stage. it is thus necessary to see what the high court held in the case of lalu prasad v. state of bihar : 2000(2)bljr1414 . paragraphs 28 to 32 read as follows: '28. the fact that separate cases have been registered and are being investigated separately and also the fact ..... cases. this was rejected by the special judge. the high court rejected the criminal appeal which was filed against the order of rejection. this judgment is reported in 2000 (3) pat. ljr 357.6. thereafter writ petitions (criminal) and a criminal misc. petition were filed before the high court of jharkhand at ranchi for amalgamation of .....

The Motor Transport Controller, Maharashtra State, Bombay and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1690; (1964)66BOMLR698; [1964(9)FLR324]; (1964)IILLJ639SC; 1965MhLJ73(SC); [1964]7SCR639

..... of the central government the conditions of service of a workman might be varied to his disadvantage notwithstanding the provisions of s. 77 of the bombay reorganisation act. we are informed, however, that there has been no such variation. the petition itself did not contain any specific assertion that there had been any ..... sub-paragraph (2) shall be deemed to affect the right of the maharashtra state road transport corporation, subject to the provisions of s. 77 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 (11 of 1960) to determine or vary after the appointed day, the conditions of service of any person who is continued in the service of the ..... the area of the operation of the bombay state road transport corporation. this came into force from the 1st january, 1957. another consequence of the states reorganisation act was that the two commercial undertakings which were known as the provincial transport services, and the state transport, marathewada, became the commercial undertakings of the state .....